Lily Absinthe Takes A Quick Look at Some Costuming Aspects of the Movie Tombstone

Tombstone1

The Earps and Doc Holiday off to the date with destiny at the OK Corral- From the movie Tombstone.

On a costuming level, the movie Tombstone never fails to excite interest and invariably, the question will arise: “How historically accurate are the costumes?” The short answer is “Somewhat…” Yes, much of the costuming is fairly accurate although one may quibble on the specific details. One of my favorites is the much-maligned Johnny Behan:

johnbehansherrif1

Johnny Behan wearing a tailored blue/gray pin stripe sack suit.

tombstone01

A better view of Johnny Behan’s suit.

Behan’s is wearing a well-tailored sack suit proper for someone in his position. Unlike the usual image of the scruffy frontier marshal or sheriff, Behan was more of a politician and his primary job was collecting enough tax revenue to keep the Cochise County government financially afloat. The actual work of dealing with criminals was tasked to several deputies.

That said, let’s take a look at the central focus of the movie, Wyatt Earp:

Wyatt Earp1

This is the iconic Wyatt Earp outfit, one that has been widely imitated over the years by those recreating the Earp persona, usually for reenactments of the gunfight at the OK Corral. Now, as for historical accuracy, the coat itself is wrong. There were no ankle-length frock coats. Anything this long would be some sort of greatcoat. The frock coat of the later 19th Century tended to come down to just above the knee.

OK, so it rates a boo and a hiss…or does it? Bear in mind that this is a movie and a movie’s primary goal it to tell a story. Costuming supports this story-telling process and it’s often subject to conscious design changes in order to increase the dramatic effect. In this case, it’s pretty successful, judging from how much it’s imitated and let’s face it, it does increase the dramatic effect, especially when done in black (both the length and color choice were deliberate choices made the director). The effects of black color, coat length, and pictures of it flapping open in the breeze all suggest a superhero figure. So in the end, it’s all about telling a story.

Now just for a little equal time, here’s the Earps and Doc Holliday off to the OK Corral gunfight in the movie Wyatt Earp:

Wyatt Earp Movie1

The Earps and Doc Holiday off to the OK Corral and thei date with destiny- from the movie Wyatt Earl.

Compared to the top picture from Tombstone, the look in the above picture from Wyatt Earp is bit more gritty and less heroic (in fact, the actual gunfight scene itself is a bit anticlimactic in the movie). One is not more “correct” than the other, both go for a specific dramatic effect. Whether one is more effective than the other is subjective, in the eye of the viewer (we have our favorite, too).

So Gentle Readers, where does this leave us? Well, it goes to show that one must be mindful of the historically correct while at the same time being mindful that a movie’s objective differs from simply a recitation of historical events in that it also seeks to entertain. As a rule, costume designers go to great lengths to school themselves on what is historically appropriate for the period being depicted and they know exactly where departures are made.

If one thinks that this is a recent development, it is not. A good example of this in an earlier era is from the movie Gone with the Wind which was released in 1939. in which the costuming of the background and supporting characters is historically correct but the costumes for the lead actors were not. In closing, we view movies with an open mind and believe that costuming for film is an art form all itself and we like that.



Lily Absinthe…Taking a Small Break

We’re working furiously to re-arrange the atelier so we can book more business and have open houses for clients. As part of the process, we’ve been consolidating our varied libraries into something more unified and that will make things more easy to locate. We are amazed at all the duplicate books we’ve acquired over the years- it’s too bad one of those duplicates is not The Opulent Era. 😉

Next stop, re-organize the fabric stash! 🙂

But have no fear, Gentle Readers, in another day we will be more than ready, willing, and able to book more orders. Let us assist with your design needs.

Hard at work sorting through all the fabric...

Hard at work sorting through all the fabric…

And after our small hiatus…

Pose de garnitures dans l'atelier de Worth, grand couturier parisien. Paris, 1907.

And soon we’ll be just as busy…

ateliers1900-2-e1373904581950

And we offer a wide variety of styles and fabrics…

worth

And we’re always ready to consult with clients…

Defining the Silhouette: Lily Absinthe Looks at the Bustle Era Further…

The Bustle Era is a fascinating period in 19th Century fashion history and it never grows old for us here at Lily Absinthe. Bustles, or Tournures, came in a variety of styles and were made from various materials.  By the early 1870s, dresses had become elliptical with the flat side towards the front. To achieve this silhouette, it was necessary to utilize undergarments that would shape and mold the outer dress to the desired shape.

Peterson's Magazine, October 1870

Peterson’s Magazine, October 1870

Le Beau Monde Cover, c. 1875.

Le Beau Monde Cover, c. 1875.

Above is the fashion plate ideal. Below are some examples from the Early and Late Bustle Eras:

Afternoon Dress, French, c. 1872; Constructed by Charles Worth; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.1110a, b)

Afternoon Dress, French, c. 1872; Designed by Charles Worth; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.1110a, b)

Above is an example from the early 1870s. Note the fullness of the skirt in the back. This is a relative restrained version of the silhouette that was prevalent during the 1870s. Below is a more restrained version of the afternoon dress, also designed by Worth in 1883. Note that the bustle has a sharper angle than the earlier one:

Picture 008

Afternoon Dress, French, c. 1883; Designed by Charles Worth; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.664a, b)

And just in case you didn’t get enough, here’s another afternoon dress designed by  Worth from 1885:

29.942a-b_side 0002

Afternoon Dress, French, 1885; Designed by Charles Worth; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.627a, b)

So what about the Mid-Bustle Era? Good question…the short answer is that the bustle didn’t disappear but rather it became more muted, moving down behind the knees and more close to the body. We’ll start with the beau ideal of the fashion plate:

tv420_bsp3

 

75.92a-b_side 0002

Afternoon Dress, American, c. 1880; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.967a, b)

009

Day Dress, American c. 1880; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.678a, b)

So, how was this silhouette achieved? Below are some of the myriad of possibilities:

546px-uspatent131840_18721

Designers were constantly looking for the next great thing. Pictured is one such style, in this case it was even patented- US Patent 131840, c. 1872

One distinct Style was that of the “lobster bustle” which takes its name from its shape resembling that of lobster.

The Lobster Bustle

The Lobster Bustle, Austrian, 1873; Constructed of cotton and horsehair; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2002.251)

Bustle, American, 1870s; Made of cotton; Metropolitan Museum of Art ( 2008.89)

Bustle, American, 1870s; Constructed of cotton; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2008.89)

1985.23.3_S

Bustle, Great Britain, c. 1883; Constructed of cotton and metal; Metropolitan Museum of Art (1985.23.3)

The above three examples are of an extended bustle that was often referred to as the “lobster bustle” because of its distinct style. So how did the dress look over the lobster bustle? Well, look here:

1870s-bustle-dress

Day Dress, c. 1873; McCord Museum (M20277.1-2)

For a more muted bustle look pads might be used and especially for the Mid-Bustle Era of 1878 – 1883, below are a few more examples:

Bustle, c. 1880

Bustle, c. 1880

Bustle, c. 1880s; Metropolitan Museum of Art (C.I.38.23.282)

Bustle, c. 1880s; Metropolitan Museum of Art (C.I.38.23.282)

And now for a little satire…fashions during the 19th Century were often the source of satire for their seeming impracticality. While the crinoline was probably first and foremost the biggest target (pardon the pun), the bustle also attracted satirical comment. Here’s one example:

Bustle1870PunchOrTheLondonCharivarl

Punch Magazine, 1870

The bustles illustrated above are just a few of the many varieties of bustles on the market during the Bustle Era and were designed with the goal of enhancing the silhouette of the outer dress to its maximum effect (with varying success). One thing you will notice in looking at all the above examples is that styles tended to bleed from one period to the next. As is the case with nearly all eras of fashion, there are no bright lines that sort each into a neat compartment but rather it’s a blur as one era moves to the next.

In much the way steel girders define the shape of a modern building, underpinnings during the Bustle Era defined the silhouette of the person wearing a garment. As is the case today, people went to great lengths to shape and define their bodies so as to achieve a specific look. As much as we may look back at this era in amusement, things have not changed all that much, only the materials and devices have. 🙂

Lily Absinthe- Moving Forward…Technology Meets the Classical

Today, Lily Absinthe took another technological leap forward with the acquisition of a new computer. Now, as much as we love designing and sewing and especially working with the historic clothing, we also have our feet firmly rooted in the 21st Century and we do not hesitate to utilize today’s technology to our advantage. Technology should work for us, not the other way around.

Karin_Computer1

Lily Absinthe- Where the modern meets the classical.

Now we have the capability of getting a proper web site in operation, work with photos and illustrations, and a host of other things that were simply not possible before. Watch world, here we come! 🙂

Fashion As A Business & Commercialization

Races at Longchamps, Manet, 1867

Races at Longchamps, Manet, 1867

In contrast to our posts of the past few days, today we go to France to take a look at Haute Couture, how it was publicized, and the start of “street style”. By no means is this an exhaustive review but merely an attempt to show some of the high points.

“Fashion” as we know it today began to take form during the late 19th Century. Essentially, fashion was something that was entering the public consciousness on a scale broader than anything ever seen before. The industrial revolution played a major role in the development of fashion in a rising standard of living combined with the development of new methods of manufacturing textile goods made clothing more affordable for more people. Along with this was the rise of the middle class who now had the money and the leisure time to be able follow fashion more closely.

Where once fashion was limited to a monarch and his court, now fashion was far more defuse. Also, just as important, fashion and clothing manufacturing were developing into larger business enterprises and business concerns often drove fashion. This is similar to what we see today but only on a more limited scale with a smaller clientele.

Along with the commercialization of fashion by Couturiers such as Charles Worth, Jacques Doucet, Paul Poiret, and a host of others, was the need to more effectively market their fashions. Where word-or-mouth was sufficient, more direct methods of getting fashion styles (i.e., product) before the public were needed and thus developed advertising, fashion journals, fashion plates, and later, fashion photography.

With the development of the fashion industry and marketing, those who followed fashion wanted to see these fashions “live”. The concept of the runway show as a public spectacle was still years off but other ways to show off the latest styles were employed.

If it's seen at Longchamps, then you're OK... :-)

If it’s seen at Longchamps, then you’re OK… As is the case today, being seen in a public place with the just the right outfit could make all the difference. 🙂

Once such method was dressing up models with the latest styles and sending them to various public social gathering such as the horse races at Longchamps and in particular, the Grand Prix de Paris which was held every year in July. More than just a horse race, it was a day-long affair that provided a venue for people to see and been seen and that of course meant what they were wearing. Naturally, the press covered these events and end was result was free publicity.

Below are just a few of the examples of the styles worn at Longchamps during the period from 1900 to 1914.

Les Modes, 1904

Les Modes, July 1904

Longchamps1

Longchamps2

tumblr_njb541lW5J1rlm2lro9_500

The women in the above pictures are wearing versions of the lingerie dress and one can see the influence of the s-bend corset although the silhouette is somewhat muted by the fluffy layers of fabric on the dresses. These definitely fall in the 1900 – 1910 time frame, probably more towards 1902 – 1905.

And sometimes, fashion at Longchamps could cause a sensation…below is a picture from 1908 of three models wearing designs by Jeanne Margaine-Lacroix (known simply as Margaine-Lacroix) and dubbed by the press “Les Nouvelles Merveilleuses”:

d587987d85c3b1012273b4927790fa9e

c. 1908, “Les Nouvelles Merveilleuses” as dubbed by the press- these three models caused a furor at Longchamps when they arrived- these dresses, designed by Jeanne Margaine-Lacroix were considered scandalous at the time.

The above three dresses definitely got public attention, in part because they completely did away with the conventional corset while at the same time creating a skin-tight silhouette by utilizing stretch fabrics in the dresses themselves to create the form-fitting silhouette.  Susie Ralph, a fashion historian, described it in an introduction that opened an exhibit on Margaine-Lacroix in 2013:

In 1908 Jeanne Margaine-Lacroix sent three mannequins to the Longchamp race-course clad in her form-revealing robes-tanagréennes. These corsetless dresses caused a sensation among Paris’ fashionable crowd – a riot according to some newspaper reports. Worn without corsets and slit to the knee on one side over the most transparent of underskirts, their impact on the fashion world was instantaneous and resulted in major press coverage not only in Paris but around the world. In today’s parlance the style immediately “went viral”….It was Margaine-Lacroix’s daring vision that brought to an end the ideal of the rigidly corseted hour-glass figure, and ushered in the new, slim twentieth century silhouette.

Margaine-Lacroix is an interesting designer in her own right although she is relatively unknown today. Hopefully we’ll be writing more about her in the future. Here, is where the above picture originally was featured:

new-picture-7

Controversy is no stranger to the world of fashion then or now and the debate over what exactly is too “revealing” still rages on. Moving on, fashion photography becomes ever more pervasive during in the years from 1910 – 1914. Here are some more examples:

1912-at-the-races

1912, Watching the races standing on chairs. The lines on these two dresses reflect the moved towards a more sleek, upright silhouette. Goodbye s-bend!

1914

1914, Here is an interesting design incorporating a waistcoat and cutaway coat.

Public spaces like Longchamps provided a venue for people to see “fashion in action” and for us, it provides a fascinating archive of fashion history that helps us to see fashion that is alive. We can see just how garments were worn, how they fit, and even gain some insight into the people who wore them.


Postscript:

Originally I set out to write this blog post about the development of fashion and how it was publicized on public places. However, along the way I also discovered the Les Nouvelles Merveilleuses controversy and the work of the a relatively now forgotten designer Margaine-LaCroix. It just goes to show that you learn something new everyday! 🙂