On The Road…

received_10208957120189297.jpeg

And Lily Absinthe is once again on the road…at least for a brief moment.  More to follow! 😉

Lilly Absinthe & Movie Costumes, Part III

In today’s post, we wrap up our review of the 24th Annual Art of Motion Picture Costume Design at the Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising Museum in Downtown Los Angeles. First, because we just can’t let it go, we’ll show one more dress from Crimson Peak :-):

20160325_104040.jpg

The above dress is worn by Edith in the picnic scene. This outfit is a mashup of various styles, combining a skirt from the mid-1890s with a pigeon-breast waist from the early 1900s. The hat reads early 1900s and while the belt style was correct for most of the period from c. 1890 through 1905, the buckle is somewhat larger than what was historically worn. No doubt the director was attempting to make a point with the oversized-hands buckle.

Below are some scenes from the picnic:

 Picnic Dress1

Picnic Dress2

As with Edith’s other dresses, this reads light and airy, a contrast to Lucille Sharp’s dresses. Finally, before moving on, here are some shoes that were produced for the movie for the Edith character to wear:

20160325_103936.jpg

On the left are the original shoes and on the right are the reproduction. Needless to say, we see the gold theme carried on even with the shoes which are concealed from view most of the time that they’re worn in the movie- talk about attention to detail! 🙂

Now, for a different type of horror, there is The Revenant:

While we are no expert on the Fur Trapper/Mountain Man Era in American History, we do can appreciate the effort that went into making these costume authentic and “lived in” to even include blood. These are brutal clothes for a brutal period, to be sure, and are definitely not the usual “Mountain Main” costumes of beads and roadkill that one normally associates with movies set in that era.

And for even more contrast, we switch from “man versus nature (and man sometimes)” to “women versus men” in the struggle for women’s right to vote with Suffragette:

The movie, from all accounts, is pretty gritty with the focus was on everyday women who took up the struggle and their clothing reflects that. This is not meant to be pretty or elegant:

20160325_105347.jpg

20160325_105354.jpg

20160325_105359.jpg

Close-Up Of The Medal

Suffragette3

20160325_105337.jpg

20160325_105342.jpg

Suffragette2

What is striking about the costumes from this movie that were on display is the use of a muted color palette. While this is not a surprise, it does provide a contrast to what we usually associate with costuming from a period piece. This movie is definitely on our list of must-sees. 🙂

Thank you all for enduring three days worth of blog posts on movie costumes with a heavy dose of Crimson Peak. It looks like we’ll be acquiring some nee DVDs to watch while we sew. 🙂

Lily Absinthe & Movie Costumes, Part II

We continue with our review of the 24th Annual Art of Motion Picture Costume Design at the Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising Museum in Downtown Los Angeles. Today, we’re going to focus a bit on the costumes from the movie Crimson Peak. And now to set the scene… 🙂

crimsonpeak_trailer

The costuming definitely reflects the dark, horrific nature of the movie. First we start with the heroine Edith:

20160325_104058.jpg

20160325_104104.jpg

Close-Up of the bodice.

20160325_104109.jpg

Close-up of the shoulder. Yes, that’s embroidered on to the fashion fabric.

This dress reads mid-1890s and with its leg-of-mutton sleeves and clean silhouette. The bodice is a gold-colored silk (or yellow, depending on the light) satin with a skirt that appears to be a shade off, leaning more towards a champagne. However, on camera the dress almost appears to be bright yellow that stands in stark contrast to the dark interiors of the Sharpe House where she goes to live and have her encounters with ghosts and past secrets. Also, her dress stands in contrast to the clothes of the other two main characters.

In the movie, the butterfly motif is used often as a symbol for the heroine Edith’s seeming fragility and this is incorporated into this and other of her costumes both with color and with decoration. Besides the related floral embroidery on the sleeves, there is also this butterfly-like decoration on the rear of the dress:

f31f4957181721f00ea5033ee5d32b6e

Here are a few more pictures:

To us, the golden-yellow dress symbolizes a purity and naivete that sets Edith apart from Thomas and Lucille Sharp who are the embodiment of corruption and evil.

In contrast to Edith is Lucille Sharpe’s costuming:

f4c551854e795036ae2ca0ed826cfc0c_600x400

20160325_104141.jpg

20160325_104148.jpg

The bodice and overskirt are made from a dark blue velvet and the underskirt appears to have been made from a silk shantung of some type. The velvet acts as a light trap, emphasizing the dark nature of the Lucille Sharp character and this is very apparent when viewed on film. Decorating the dress is a vine that runs up the bodice front to the neck and down the bodice back. The vine trim also is seen running along the hem of the overskirt. In terms of silhouette, it would appear to be late 1870s/early 1880s (Mid Bustle Era), judging from the low demi-train. There does not appear to be any form of a bustle or it’s too subtle to detect in the dress display.

Although we were unable to get a shot of the rear of the dress, here it is from another source:

7b396ed11564b5c6139bc9404392ea98

Here we see an interesting vine effect on the back that continuous to the front. Although one can read many interpretations, the one we took away was that it represents Lucille’s hold over everyone and everything in her world and how it also threatens to entwine and trap Edith.

And now, the dress in action:

It is interesting how the dress changes color when viewed on film versus the static environment of a museum setting. In the film, the blue takes on a shade that harmonizes with the interior of the house while the brown trim almost fades  out to a black.

And just to note, her brother, Thomas Sharpe, also has a coat in a similar shade of blue:

20160325_104158.jpg

Crimson Peak_Blue Coat

crimson-peak

For contrast, we now look at another dress of Lucille’s:

20160325_104215.jpg

The bodice and skirts are made from a crimson (naturally!) red satin with the underskirt being completely knife-pleated. It certainly emphasizes Lucille’s nature- attractive and enticing yet deadly at the same time.

20160325_104221.jpg

Here we see the dress in action:

One interesting detail we noted what that on this dress and the preceding blue dress, the skirts were not hemmed (we were unable to get a good one of the blue dress):

944971_10153284808107693_7464895273696542597_n

Although one could argue that it was simply due to oversight since they were working with multiple garments in a sub-optimal situation (the red clay effects), we believe that it was more due to calculation on the part of the costume designer. Much of the movie revolves around themes of seduction, appearance, corruption and ultimate horror. While Lucille and her brother Thomas have an elegance and seductive beauty, underneath there is corruption and ultimate evil and this dress symbolizes that neatly. One is attracted to the rich, crimson red silk satin and Lucille’s seeming beauty but peaking out here and there is what truly lies underneath (if one looks for it and isn’t swept away by surface appearances). The frayed hem subtly but effectively conveys this.

Finally, we just want to note that in contrast to Edith and her female contemporaries we see in the beginning of the movie, the costumes that Lucille wears are roughly 15 to 20 years older in terms of style and it puts them a little out of synch with the world around them- a cleaver and subtle touch to be sure. While the average viewer would probably not pick up on this detail, it does add to the fantastical/horrific elements of the movie.

We’ve spent a lot of time on Crimson Peak but those are the costumes that had the greatest impact on us. While we have no plans to create replicas of the costumes, we can safely say that it will serve as a further source of inspiration for us (well, maybe not the frayed hems 🙂 ). Stay tuned for more!

(To be continued…)

 

The Philosophy Of Paul Poiret – Principles Of Correct Dress

Poiret_Studio

Paul Poiret was one of the most influential designers during the early 20th Century and he played a major role in shaping haute couture and the fashion industry as we know it today. Most notably, Poiret helped ensure the demise of the corset, and especially it’s most recent incarnation in the form of the s-bend corset, and introduced new designs that moved fashion away from highly structured silhouettes to more loose ones based on draping rather than tailoring. Also, Poiret was noted for the development of the hobble skirt and the “lampshade dress” as well as incorporating oriental elements in his designs.

Here we see just one example of the “lampshade” dress style from 1912:

However, lost in all of Poiret’s achievements is consideration of his ideas, or “philosophy” were about dress itself. One charge that is often laid on haute couture and their designers is that wealth automatically equates to good or “correct” dress. To Poiret:

This art has little in common with money. The woman whose resources are limited has no more cause for being dowdily dressed than the woman who is rich has reason to believe that she is beautifully gowned. Except in so far as money can procure the services of a good dressmaker, of an artist who can judge his customer’s style and garb her accordingly, the wealthy woman stands no better chance of being correctly dressed than the woman who must turn every penny before spending it. [1]

While the above is almost a truism when it comes to fashion, at least today, it’s still revealing coming from the man who had crowned himself the “King of Fashion.” Poiret further expands on this theme, stating that dressing is:

…not an easy art to acquire. It demands a certain amount of intelligence, certain gifts, some of them among the rarest, perhaps—it requires a real appreciation of harmony, of colors, ingenious ideas, absolute tact, and, above all, a love of the beautiful and clear perception of values. It may be resumed in two words, good taste. [2]

So, what is “good taste” to Poiret?

Taste is by no means developed by riches; on the contrary, the increasing demands of luxury are killing the art of dressing. Luxury and good taste are in inverse proportion to each other. The one will kill the other as machinery is crowding out handwork. In fact, it has come so far that many persons confuse the two terms. Because a material is expensive they find it beautiful; because it is cheap they think it must be ugly. [3]

The above is as true today as it was back then and we see it in the fashion nearly every day. Naturally, “good taste” can be somewhat subjective, depending on time and place but it still gets to the idea that one cannot simply buy their way into good taste, or by extension, good fashion.

Here we see a sample of the fashion illustrations that Poiret commissioned by various avant garde artists such as Paul Iribe. Here we see a definite revival of the simple vertical lines of the empire dress style:

Poiret also notes that:

In order not to appear entirely at odds with her surroundings and the place where she lives, a woman is obliged to follow fashions to a certain extent. But let that be within certain bounds. What does it matter if tight skirts be the fashion if your figure demands a wide one? Is it not important to dress so as to bring out your good points rather than to reveal the bad? Can any idea of being fashionable make up for the fact of being ridiculous? [4]

And there it it- Poiret gets to the heart of the matter by pointing out that fashion is about emphasizing one’s good points rather than the bad, something that holds true today as it did then. The above has been only a small sample of the depth of Poiret’s fashion “philosophy” but it’s interesting to see that his ideas still hold true today in many ways and as such, they represent a distinct break with the 19th Century.

1. Principles of Correct Dress, Florence Hull Winterburn, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1914, p. 237.
2. Ibid., pp. 237-238
3. Ibid., p. 239
4. Ibid., pp. 240-241



1914 Fashions – A Brief Overview

4105820379_a9248b3231_z

1914 marked a violent transition between worlds which saw the unleashing of forces that ultimately saw the end of the stable and orderly political, social, and economic European-dominated world order. The events of the First World War ultimately led to a near-complete reordering of political, social, economic and cultural institutions that saw the elimination of the certainties of the prewar world and more importantly, it shattered people’s belief in a world that was constantly improving and becoming a better place for all.

As with other institutions, fashion was deeply affected by the war and the evidence can be readily seen in the shift in silhouettes away from the structured forms that had dominated fashions since the 19th Century. More profoundly, the war saw the introduction of more utilitarian designs in response to women’s changing role in society. Women were now increasingly working outside of the home, primarily in response to labor shortages due to men going off to war, women were increasingly working outside of the home and fashions evolved in response. At the same time, fashions changed in response to outside forces such as materials shortages and changing social attitudes. Finally, it must be noted that many fashion trends that occurred during the First World War did not represent a complete break with the past; many fashion trends we see during the war were a continuation of trends which had been developing from about 1908 on.

So what were some of the basic style details trending in 1914? First, the most obvious is that hemlines were significantly higher than anything previously. Since the early 1900s, hemlines (mostly in daywear) had been steadily moving up, starting with the ankle and moving up to the lower leg. Second, clothing had evolved towards a less structured silhouette with the introduction (or rather re-introduction) of the empire line/Directoire style. Also, this trend towards a more flowing, looser look was also inspired by Oriental fashions and the draped clothing of Classic Greece.

To begin, here are some typical day dresses from various sources. First, we start with some fashion plates:

1914 Pattern2

bd5a723af03264d0d60c91aea2e573fffa7d7cecc54ff56428aa36ce5ceff75c

And for some extant examples:

Below is a day dress from 1910:

Day Dress 1910

Day Dress, 1910; Glenbow Museum

And another day dress from c. 1914 – 1915:

Day Dress 1914

Day Dress, Anne Talbot, c. 1914 – 1915; Victorian & Albert Museum (T.166 to B-1967)

And finally, one from c. 1915:

For evening/formal wear, one can see a variety of new designs to include the return of the empire/Directoire style:

The influence of Orientalism can be seen here:

Probably one of the most dramatic designs were those by Mariano Fortuny and in particular, his Delphos Dress which was reminiscent of Classical Greece:

Fortuny

Delphos Dress – Mariano Fortuny, c. 1910

So by 1914 the perfectly sculpted, corseted figure created by the s-bend corset had disappeared and while clothes still retained some structure, that structure came from the clothes themselves, rather than from the undergarments. However, to be sure, structured undergarments were still worn but the effect tended to be more subtle and not so obvious.

One other significant trend was the movement away from the hobble skirt. Originally developed by Paul Poiret around 1908, the hobble skirt with it’s narrow skirt was visually appealing but severely inhibited the wearer’s movement. Below is just one example of the controversial hobble skirt style from 1910:

Later, the more extreme features of the style were somewhat mitigated by various designers by including hidden gussets and various other contrivances in an effort to restore practical movement yet maintain the style. Jeanne Paquin was noted for including incorporating hidden pleats at the bottom of her dresses to allow for more fuller movement, such as with this dress:

Jeanne Paquin - Hobble Skirt

Finally, to conclude, here are a couple of humorous views of the hobble skirt trend:

Cartoons-Punch-1910-04-20-280

Punch, 1910

Hobble Skirt Postcard

For the fashion world in France, the outbreak of the war in 1914 was a catastrophe. With the country mobilizing for war and Paris under threat from the advancing German armies, there was mass economic disruption and the bottom fell out of the luxury goods markets resulting in mass layoffs and many of the great fashion houses either closing or scaling back their business. With the Battle of the Marne eliminating the threat German to Paris, the war settled into a long-term affair and the fashion industry was able to recover by by contracts for the production of uniforms for an expanding French Army.

The preceding survey is just a small has been a brief one and we are admittedly painting with an extremely large brush. However, we want to emphasize that fashion never exists in isolation from the rest of society and that it is subject to the influence of world events. For the fashion world, the First World War marked a definite and final break with the past. In future blog posts, we’ll further explore these themes so stay tuned.