Jacques Doucet, Part 1

jacques-doucet-dog

Jacques Doucet (1853 – 1929), portrait taken in 1926.

In this post, we’re going to take a look at another of Charles Frederick Worth’s contemporaries, Jacques Doucet. Born in 1853, Doucet was born to a prosperous family who ran a lingerie and linens business that had been established in 1817. In 1871 Doucet opened his first salon, specializing in women’s fashions. Doucet was also known as a patron of the arts and from 1880 to his death in 1929, he amassed large collections of manuscripts, furniture, paintings and various objects d’art. The 18th Century was especially one of his favorite periods and it influenced many of his designs.

Here is one of his earlier designs:

1984.337ab_F (1)

Jacques Doucet, Day Dress, c. 1880; Metropolitan Museum of Art (1984.337a, b)

1984.337ab_B

Rear View

1984.337ab_TQL

Rear three-quarter profile.

1984.337ab_S

Side Profile View

1984.337b_d3 1984.337b_d2

With this dress, Doucet utilizes a combination of beaded trim,  lace, and embroidered fabrics to achieve an elegant  and refined design. The embroidered design on the bodice is especially striking. Below is a close-up of the design:

1984.337b_d (1)

The relatively unadorned skirt serves as a background/counterpoint, thus allowing the bodice and sleeves to take center focus. The trim on the skirt hem is easy to overlook but it also adds a subtle touch but you really have to look at for a bit before it makes it’s impact. Finally, there are the enameled buttons which also lend another decorative touch:

Enameled buttons run down the front of the bodice.

1984.337a_label

And of course, the label.

Looking at the train, it appears that there was a minimal bustle which was characteristic of dresses from the early 1880s. However, the train appears to almost untidy and somewhat clumsy, detracting from the overall effect of the dress. It is hard to say if the way the dress is displayed above was worn in the same manner but I would suspect not. It would appear that the dress was not properly bustled when it was set up on display but this is only our opinion.

Doucet was known for the use of various transparent materials and extensive beadwork and jeweling. Below are some examples:

001

Doucet, Evening Dress, c. 1898 – 1900; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.2533a, b)

Bodice

Close-up of the bead and trim work.

According to the Met Website, the dress had become fragile (which explains why it’s not mounted on a mannequin). The decoration on the outside appears to be a combination of jewels, metallic bead work, gold lamé and fabric set on a base netting of sorts (it’s hard to tell from just the photo alone).

Below is another example of Doucet’s work in gold lamé:

Jacques Doucet, Ball Gown, c. 1898 – 1902; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.3274a, b)

Rear View

Side Profile

Black and white three-quarters view.

Three-Quarter View

65.184.64a-b view2

The ball gown is constructed from a gold lamé and trimmed in gold appliques on the skirt and bodice. The bodice combines gold lamé, appliques, and netting. The full impact of the gold lamé is not fully evident until one looks at the three three-quarter view pictures above. The gold lamé appears fairly lifeless but when it’s viewed as a three-dimensional garment, the dress seems to come alive; it can only be imagined how the dress would have looked when it was first worn.

Doucet’s use of metallic fabrics, embroidery, and trim were inspired by 18th Century design elements to create rich textures that were delicate and overwhelming at the same time. In short, it was luxury taken to its ultimate limit.

In our next installment, we’ll take a further look at Doucet so stay tuned! 🙂

To Be Continued…

Currently In Design…

We are never idle here at Lily Absinthe, we’re either designing or constructing garments in a seemingly never-ending cycle. Below is one of our current designs we are working on, an afternoon or visiting dress designed by Charles Worth in 1879:

1880worth

Visiting Dress, Charles Worth, 1879; Museum of the City of New York (40.74.2)

Here are some more views:

MNY30604

MNY252335

MNY252340

MNY252337

Unfortunately, the photography does not do justice to the dress; if you compare the top picture with the four views below it, it does not appear that they are the same dress. But rest assured, they are; this dress is referenced in The Opulent Era and the top picture appears there in black and white.

Now, as to the dress itself, according to the Museum of the City of New York, the dress fabric is a “striped satin over a lavender mock underdress”. In looking at the above pictures, it would appear that the base fabric is a brown silk shot through with a lighter, copper-like silk. In the first picture, it is obvious that the lighting for the picture is passing from left to right and that the dress is reflecting the light, revealing the lighter copper color. Of course, this is somewhat speculative; since we do not have physical access to the garment it is hard to tell for sure.

But nevertheless, we are working on the premise that the base fabric is a brown/copper silk and that will guide our design choices. The faux lavender underdress is fairly straight-forward in terms of color and it presents a nice counterpoint to the brown-copper base fabric.

In terms of style, the dress is a princess line characteristic of the Mid-Bustle Era of the late 1870s – early 1880s and the emphasis is on vertical lines, helped along by the use of the faux underdress. Also, the use of a faux cravat, mock sash, and trim using in identical brocade fabric further enhance the vertical “long line” effect. Below are some fashion plates showing examples of the princess line for the Mid Bustle Era:

Fashion Plate 1878

Journal Des Demoiselles, September 1878

9205027658_7d60a9ce63_b

Godey’s Lady’s Book, September 1880

For the rear train, we will most likely use a bustle pad and bustle that’s designed to push the dress away at the knee level. Unfortunately, the display of this dress lacks this and the rear train looks like a loose jumble of fabric. Although minimal trains are characteristic of Mid-Bustle Era dresses, they were still present and served to shape and direct the dress’ train. In the display of the above dress, the train simply drags when it should be mostly off the ground, unlike an evening dress or ball gown.

We will post progress pictures as our design takes shape during the creation process so stay tuned for more! 😉

Fashion Plates…

Fashion plates are often criticized as fashion history documentation because their representations of period fashions that bear no relation to what those particular period fashions ACTUALLY looked like. At best, they’re fantastical distortions of reality, representing an ideal that could never be attained (of course, the same argument can be made about today’s fashions as depicted in the fashion press).

Cover Petersons 1887

However, nothing could be further from the truth. The reality was that fashion plates, both colored and black and white, played a practical role in the transmission of fashion information during the 19th and early 20th Centuries; fashion photography would not come into its own until the 1910s. While  the study of fashion plates as an art form in itself has become popular today, this was not what they were intended to be. Rather, it was a blueprint for individuals to be able to replicate a given design.

Cover Godeys 1885 Cover Harpers Bazar 1885

However, at the same time, fashion plates did present ideal views of their subject garments with their unnatural poses and the models were perfect physical representations. But never the less, fashion plates were first and foremost meant to be a practical means of transmitting fashion information. Ultimately, the fashion plate was a practical tool and used as such.

Cover Delineator 1890

More specifically, the fashion plate was deliberately constructed to impart information to the viewer and specifically to enable the viewer to be able to make a garment based on the plate- in short, “how to do it” blueprints and as such they were often used as supplements to accompanying sewing patterns and were typically printed in magazines. Magazines such as The Delineator, Godey’s Lady’s Book, Harper’s Bazar, and Peterson’s Magazine were only a few of the many magazines that were available to the home sewer and professional dressmaker.

Petersons June 1870

Fashion Plate from Peterson’s Magazine, June 1872.

Above is a fairly typical fashion plate- it looks like a simple illustration of a group of dresses. Well, yes and no- the poses are somewhat stilted with the emphasis on showing as much of the dress as possible. Notice how the decorative treatments are given the best angle possible and especially on the train. This was deliberately done in order for the viewer to see the entire design in order to replicate it.

But it was not only fashion plates. Patterns and more detailed information were also supplied:

evening polonaiseL

Evening Polonaise Pattern from Peterson’s Magazine, May 1872.

Petersons Nov 1880

Fashion plates simply illustrated what was possible and were meant as a source of inspiration, not necessary something to be followed line-for-line. But more importantly, fashion plates showed the progression of styles through the late 19th Century and just by glancing at them, one can readily see differences and especially in the silhouette as it evolved from the 1870s through the  1890s. Here are some some examples from the 1870s and 1880s:

Godey's Lady's Book, November 1872

Godey’s Lady’s Book, November 1872

Englishwomens Domestic Magazine June 1876

The Englishwomen’s Domestic Magazine, June 1876

Plate 2

The Englishwomen’s Domestic Magazine, July 1877

Le Mode Illustree 1878

La Mode Illustree, 1878

Fashion Plate, 1881 from the Revue de La Mode.

Revue de La Mode, 1881.

Revue de Mode1

Revue de La Mode, 1885

9a31e8c7dc5de5e478bb981478521847

C. 1886

Petersons April 1889

Peterson’s Magazine, April 1889

As we move into the 1890s, still more shifts in the what was considered to be the ideal silhouette can be seen:

1892

Journal Des Demoiselles, January 1892

Journal Des Demoiselles, August 1893

Journal Des Demoiselles, August 1894

Delineator 1898 Dec

The Delineator, December 1898

Delineator 1898 Dec_2

The Delineator, December 1898

What is interesting about this progression of plates is that by the 1890s, it’s all about the front of the dress. While there are frontal views in earlier plates and rear views in later plates, it is still obvious that the emphasis had shifted which is consistent with the movement away from the bustle. The 1880s provide some interesting ground in that the views seem to almost split 50-50, at least based on a very unscientific examination of fashion plates from various sources, both online and in books.

The above is only a small sample of the fashion illustration that was characteristic of the late 19th and early 20th Centuries but it does show that even then, the dissemination of fashion information was being done on a large-scale industrial basis, pushed along by technical advances in the printing trades. Moreover, with the rise of mass-circulation fashion magazines such as Godey’s, Petersons, and Harper’s Bazar, fashion’s reach extended to almost the entire world and most notably in America. The “pretty” and “fantastical” fashion plate served a very specific and practical role that today is easily overlooked. In the end, fashion plates were an art form in terms of their ability to impart information rather than existing as representations of fashion.



Emile Pingat, Part 2

Today we continue our examination of the work of Emile Pingat with a few more examples of his designs:

ae287c7373a94193026452c5be9b3e94

Emile Pingat, Dinner Dress, c. 1883 – 1885; Smith College Historic Clothing Collection (1989.1.3ab)

504090D

The above dinner dress is definitely out of the mid-1880s and here one can see that the bodice has retreated above the hips. However, there is not much of a train and the bustle is relative restrained. The blue silk fabrics are rich and deep-hued while at the same time, the white accents along the base of the bodice, rear tails, and skirt hem provide a stark contrast that serves to lighten the dress’ appearance.

4cde354ea202cc8aa24f12f90e8ab4dd

Pingat, Promenade Dress, 1888; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.7758a, b)

70.53.1a-b_back_CP1

70.53.1 bw

Left Side Profile- Unfortunately, the photography does not do justice to the dress.

70.53.1 (2440)

The above promenade dress is striking in that Pingat drew inspiration from the late 17th and early 18th Centuries by creating the bodice as a Justaucorps, with a faux waistcoat set underneath (at least it appears to be a faux waistcoat from the photos). For comparison, below is an example of a Justaucorps worn by Peter the Great, circa 1727 – 1730: 1727-1730 French Coat and waistcoat worn by Tsar Peter II at the Moscow Kremlin Museums -

Finally, we come to what must be thepièce de résistance or close to it:

50.72.13_front_CP4

Pingat, Evening Jacket, 1893; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.139)

50.72.13_back_CP4

Rear View

The details of this jacket are almost unsurpassed and combine embroidery and feathers to create its effect. Below are some pictures of the jacket being worn with a dress:

50.72.13 bw 50.72.13

50.72.13_front bw

In examining the above coat, one can see elements of the 18th Century waistcoat style mixed in with elements found in a 16th Century Schaube coat.

The examples shown above and in the previous post reveal the range of Pingat and clearly demonstrate that his designs were easily the equal to Worth’s. In some regards, it could be argued that Pingat’s were superior in that Pingat was far more disciplined in that every element, whether fabric, trim, or color, were used to created an integrated whole. All the elements of Pingat’s designs had a specific purpose rather than simply being added on willy-nilly. Pingat’s legacy has been greatly underappreciated but I hope that this situation will be reversed in the near future.