Buffalo Bill, Fashion Trends, Hats, and the American West…

It is a truism that fashion can be influenced by a variety of things, no matter how removed from the “centers” of fashion they are. During the 19th and early 20th Centuries, this was especially the case with Paris being the fashion capital of the world.

The American West has always exerted a profound influence on the mind of the Old World and especially so during the 1880s and 1890s. Tales of seemingly endless cheap land, wild animals, Indians, and the promise of a better life (helped along by heavy promotion by the railroads and others) fueled people’s imaginations in Europe and this was reflected in the tide of immigration to the United States.

Of course, the reality was often different but people still kept on coming. As the “real” American West was steadily being transformed into an integrated part of the United States, the image of the earlier, “wild” and unsettled West still exerted a powerful influence and showmen such as William F. Cody moved to cash in with his Wild West Show.

Cody’s Wild West Show ran from 1884 through 1908 and during that time, he and his show toured the United States and Europe. With its various acts recreating stage coach robberies, Indian attacks, the even Custer’s last stand, Cody brought to life the “authentic” American West for people and this was especially the case when the show toured Europe.

77ed6fad15f32a9bcbf1b0a13db22688

In 1889, the Show performed in Paris from May 18, 1889 through November 14, 1889 as part of the 1889 Exposition Universelle. During its run in Paris, the show performed twice daily to crowds of 20,000 and more and from all accounts, the show was a major success.

world-s-fair-or-exposition-universelle-of-1889-paris

So, with that background, on to fashion and in particular one hat:

Buffalo Bill Hat 1

This hat was made by a Mme Colombin, rue de la Tour-d’Auvergne, and was featured in an 1889 issue of La Mode Illustrée, a leading fashion journal of the day, and marketed as a “Buffalo Bill Hat”. For comparison, here are two images of William F. Cody:

995713f3833fa80522080b41976be78a buffalobillIt’s hard to tell whether this was an isolated example or if there was more out there- it bears more research but in the meantime, it’s still fascinating that a fashionable Paris milliner would make the effort to create an interpretation of Cody’s hat. Of course, fashion influenced by the American West is not unknown but most of it comes later. Anyway, we hope you’ve enjoyed this little fashion tidbit. 🙂

Trending for March 13, 1898….

Fashions do not develop in a vacuum and bicycle suits are no exception. With women taking up cycling during the 1880s/1890s, there was a need for practical clothing. One of the key trends seen in cycling clothes was the shortening of the skirt, necessitated by the need to avoid getting the skirt tangled up on the chain plus facilitating mounting and dismounting of the bike. Moreover, the materials used tended towards the more sturdy, practical and possessing some water repellent qualities.

Cycling-1898-Womens-outfits-BE-1

The article below is from the March 13, 1898 issue of the Los Angeles Herald and it comments on cycling clothes as well as other practical aspects of women’s dress. What is most striking is that presents an tiny window into some of the fashion trends that were developing during the 1890s that reflected the rise of the New Woman. Enjoy!

1898_March_1a

From the March 13, 1898 issue of the Los Angeles Herald.

And For A Little More Mauveine…

As a small follow-up to our previous posting in regard to Mauveine, below are two pictures on very striking example from the 1860s. What is especially remarkable is that the color is so vivid over 100 years later; it’s almost glowing.

Mauvein Dress1

Day Dress, French, c. 1860 – 1870; Victoria and Albert Museum (T.118 to D-1979)

Mauvein Dress2

Rear View

The color is simply amazing and it’s easy to understand why aniline dyes because popular during the 19th Century.

Dating a Dress – You Be The Judge

One of the key elements of working with historical costume is the ability to properly date items, or at least fix an approximate time frame. Although we tend to accept how museums date their collections, sometimes there are items that just do not seem right for the period that is being attributed to the item.

Recently, I came across the following dress on the Metropolitan Museum of Art website:

Purple Dress1

Visiting Dress, French, 1867; Metropolitan Museum of Art (1979.93a, b)

Purple Dress2

Rear View

View3

Side Profile View

1979.93a_d

Maker’s Label; Gathering more information about the maker would go a long way towards precisely dating the dress.

According to the description on the Met website, the dress dates from 1867. However, in looking at the silhouette of the dress, it just reads Early Bustle Era, sometime between 1870 and 1874 or thereabouts.

Specifically, in looking at the skirt, it is evident that it was expressly designed to flow towards the rear, thus creating a defined train. But this train is not some haphazard arrangement of fabric but rather it is constructed of several separate panels joined together separated by rows of ruffles. The overall effect is that skirt naturally flows and the eye is drawn from front to rear. It is clear that the skirt and train were deliberately constructed to give this flowing effect. Finally, the rows of ruffled trim also help to accentuate the effect and the striped fabric also plays a role in this.

Now before going any further, we need to consider that there could be a number of different reasons why the date of the dress may be incorrect. It is always possible that perhaps it was not displayed correctly or that it’s missing key components underneath. Perhaps it was reconstructed and as a result the silhouette has changed. Like people, museums can make mistakes. With that said, let’s proceed.

So what do some later 1860s dresses look like?

19830010129 ac

Day Dress, c. 1860 – 1870; Kent State University Museum (1983.001.0129 a-c)

19830010129 ac-2

Side Profile View

19830010129 ac-3

Rear View

According to the Kent State University Museum website, the date is attributed to the entire decade of the 1860s (perhaps they are hedging their bets). However, knowing that the crinoline silhouette was characteristic of dresses of the early 1860s, it is fairly safe to say that this one is from the mid to late 1860s.

That said, let’s look at the skirt in some detail. first, like the first dress, it also flows in a rearward manner and the hem is also elliptical rather than circular (which also helps place this in the med to late 1860s).  The thin stripes and the trim help to give a flowing effect but it is nowhere as refined as that in the first example.

Let’s look at another example:

19830010107 ab-2

Day Dress, c. 1865 – 1870 (Although it is noted that the original catalog card notes the year 1865); Kent State University Museum (1983.001.0107 ab)

19830010107 ab-3

Side Profile View

19830010107 ab-4

Rear View

Once again, we have an elliptical skirt that is drawn towards the rear in a somewhat minimalist train. The effect here is a bit more confused than the previous example but in both cases, we have dresses that can be that can be placed in the mid to late 1860s and one can see the beginning of the evolution towards the elaborately trains characteristic of the later Bustle Era.

Just to round things out, below are some fashion plates representative of the period:

Godey's Ladysbook, January 1866

Godey’s Lady’s Book, January 1866

For 1866, one sees very little difference between these and dresses from the early 1860s.

1867-03 world of fashion 4

The World of Fashion, 1867

Godeys September

Godey’s Lady’s Book, September 1867

Peterson's, July 1868

Peterson’s, July 1868

For the above two plates, one can see the beginnings of the train as the skirt starts to shift towards the rear…

Victoria, 1869

Victoria, April 1869

For 1869, we finally are able to see a more completely defined train but it’s still fairly rudimentary compared to what was to come later.

And finally, we reach the 1870s:

Godey's Lady's Book , March 1870

Godey’s Lady’s Book , March 1870

Godey's Lady's Book, May 1870

Godey’s Lady’s Book, May 1870

Here we see a more complete transition. In the above plate, the dress third from the right is especially striking in the use of a striped front panel to create a flat, vertical look to the front of the dress while at the same there’s a well-defined train in the rear.

Godey's Lady's Book, November 1872

Godey’s Lady’s Book, November 1872

In the above illustrations, we have traced the transition from the crinoline to the bustle, or at least a good part of the process. One can seen not just a transition to an elliptical hemline and the development of the train, but a more sophisticated version of this style. This is not a process of gathering up some fabric and creating a crude trailing effect but rather, it’s precisely engineered to achieve a specific effect, an effect more characteristic of the early 1870s.

Naturally, much of the evaluation process is subjective and open to varied interpretation and that is all right. In the absence of hard data such as information about the dressmaker, we can only speculate but we definitely can narrow down the date. Thanks for bearing with us through this somewhat academic exercise and we welcome your comments. Let us know what you think. 🙂


 


Lily Absinthe Takes a Brief Look at the New Woman of the 1890s

To the casual observer, the 1890s seemed to be little different from previous decades and was simply part of a monolithic seemingly never-ending “Victorian  Era”. However, the reality was far different and during this decade, major social, political, and economic changes were beginning to occur. Some changes would take decades to ultimately play out while others would occur at a much faster rate.

One of the most profound social changes during the 1890s was the rise of the “New Woman,” a woman who pursued an autonomous life independent from traditional marriage and motherhood. One key elements of the “New Woman” was that she was not economically dependent on a husband, pursuing an independent career. While this was the ideal, in practice it did not always work out this way but still it signaled a major change in women’s social roles. Along with this sense of independence, women also pursued leisure time activities outside of the home, something facilitated by the development of various sporting activities such as bicycling.

The rise of the New Woman was naturally reflected in the world of fashion. Most significantly, fashions began to become somewhat more functional (although the corset still remained part as an element of dress). With more women entering the workforce on the white collar level, more practical styles developed, the two most notable being the shirtwaist/skirt combination and the tailormade suit.

First, we turn to the shirtwaist/skirt combination. Shirtwaists were available in an almost endless multitude of styles and materials, the shirtwaist was a basic garment and available at prices for just about every wallet. Some were more feminine, featuring embroidery while others were meant to mimic men’s shirts. Fabrics could vary from sturdy cottons for day wear to silks and taffetas for more formal evening wear and came in white and various colors. Finally, sleeves tended to be larger around the shoulders during the early to mid 1890s, mimicking the distinct leg of mutton sleeve style found in dresses of the period.

Shirtwaist2

Shirtwaist, American, c. 1899 – 1902; Made of cotton; Metropolitan Museum of Art (C.I.51.15.16a, b)

Collar1

Detachable Collar, Metropolitan Museum of Art

The above shirtwaist has a band collar, intended for use with a detachable collar as pictured below:

6a01156f47abbe970c0134875407cc970c

Shirtwaist, c. 1890 – 1899; made of silk; Fashion Institute of Design Museum (2003.793.7AB)

The above examples are interesting in that the pleating is gathered into a band along the bottom of the shirtwaist. This would be covered by the skirt, thus creating a crisp, neat appearance.

Now for something a bit more fancy:

91b5e99f72417dc7917e2f606e19a8ec

Shirtwaist, c. 1895; Made of silk/cotton; Metropolitan Museum of Art (C.I.56.10.8)

And it came in colors:

4cd531e73526715d2a2b7100e44bbefc

Shirtwaist, c. 1896 – 1898; Made from color print cotton; Metropolitan Museum of Art (C.I.59.32.4)

The shirtwaist/skirt combination was extremely versatile and could be used as an early form of sportswear for activities such as golf:

ce257125a81f4b3e3a2f99407ae4f099

Shirtwaist and skirt combination with belt, c. 1893; Kyoto Costume Institute (AC2122 79-6-9AF, AC2123-2124 79-6-10AB)

charles-dana-gibson

Charles Dana Gibson, once again…

  And of course, bicycling 🙂 :

fafb95e57c20c2149c9166744871608c

Charles Dana Gibson, 1896

24ed644599d780623ce5e5cf696e0361

Unknown woman, probably early to mid 1890s, judging from the sleeves.

 Ties were sometimes worn with the shirtwaist for a more formal look:

86e21adf4882bce35a177b534112794b

Radfahrkostüm (Bicycle costume), c. 1900; Wien Museum

During the 1890s, tailors began to branch out into women’s clothing, making tailored suits styled for women and were known as “Tailoremades”. These afforded a more practical mode of dress for women who left the home. Below are just a few examples:

CI53.72.9a–c_F

Suit, American, c. 1892; Made from wool and cotton; Metropolitan Museum of Art (C.I.53.72.9a–c)

The lines of the above suit are clean, the skirt relatively narrow. Overall, there is little adornment although the jacket is cut wide to expose the shirtwaist underneath. On top, wide lapels catch the eye and the trim pattern helps set them off. Overall, an understated look that reflected the rise of the “New Woman.”

Doucet

Suit, French, 1895; Designed by the Jacques Doucet; Made from linen, with collar and cuffs embroidered with silk cord, elastic stays attached to the inside of the skirt to control the fullness; V&A Museum (T.15&A-1979)

Doucet3

Another view.

Once again we see clean lines only now the skirt is perhaps a little wider and the sleeves taking on the leg of mutton style. There is little in the way of decorative adornments except for the lapels but even here it’s hard to make out.

M2003.12.2.1-2-P1

Suit, c. 1898; McCord Museum (M2003.12.2.1-2)

Finally, we have an example representative of the late 1890s. The lines of the suit are still clean only now both the skirt and sleeves are narrow and restrained. There is some decoration but it’s subtle.

Also, like their male counterparts, Tailormades could also take the form of a three-piece suit:

b70feffab16955655d7e48f981df9d3a

Finally, Tailormade Suits also were a logical choice for women who wanted to ride bicycles and the market responded with some of the first examples of “sportswear”. The only difference between the cycling suit and a regular Tailormade suit was that the skirt was shorter. Below is one example:

Picture 015

Cycling Suit, American, c. 1896 – 1898; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.532a–d)

The 1890s saw women taking on a more independent, autonomous existence and fashion followed this trend. While it fell short of what was to come during the mid to late 20th Century, it was still a major departure for women and one can see the traditional order of male/female relationships begin to shift. Fashion is constantly adapting to social change and the 1890s were no exception. The Victorian Era was definitely on its way out.