Nadezhda Lamanova- Between Two Worlds, Part 1

As with many of our posts, the subject of this one started with one topic but ended with a completely different topic. Initially, we came across some pictures of a ballgown that had been designed in the early 1900s for the Empress Alexandra Feodorovna, consort of the Nicholas II, the last Emperor of Russia. Then, we noted that the designer was a one Nadezhda Lamanova. What was interesting here was that it was both a designer that was unknown to us and even more striking was that she was female. While almost all of the labor force making Haute Couture dresses were female, it was rare that the designer was female, at least before the 1920s.

Who was Nadezhda Lamanova? Unfortunately, there is not a lot in English about her but here’s what we did find out: Lamanova was born on December 14, 1861 in Nizhni Novgorod, Russia and died in Moscow on October 15, 1941 at the age of 79. Due to her parents’ death at an early age, in 1877 she underwent training as a seamstress at the Moscow School of Sewing. Two years later, she went to work for a fashion house. In 1885, she opened her own dressmaking shop in Moscow and successfully built up her business;  until it had become the most popular dressmaking establishment in Moscow. At some point (the translation is unclear), she traveled to Paris and met up with Paul Poiret-  hopefully we can find out more about this in the future. Eventually, her work came to the attention to the Imperial Court and she was designated as “Supplier of the Court of Her Imperial Majesty” with her designs being worn by the ladies of the Court and the Empress herself.  Finally,  starting around 1901, Lamanova also designed costumes for theatrical productions.

Надежда_Петровна_Ламанова

Early portrait of Nadezhda Lamanova, date unknown.

Nadezhda_Lamanova_by_Valentin_Serov_1911

Nadezhda Lamanova, portrait by Valentin Serov, 1911.

However, it’s after the Russian Revolution where Lamanova’s career became even more interesting. Arrested in 1919 by the Bolshevik Government (having been an officially designated designer for the Imperial Court could easily have been her death warrant), she was freed by the intervention of the writer Maxim Gorky after spending about 2 1/2 months in prison. Afterwards, she focused on designing theatrical costumes (presumably rehabilitating herself in the eyes of the Bolshevik regime in the process).

The Bolshevik Revolution- Big changes were coming to Russia…

By early 1920s, Lamanova had started designing clothing aimed at the masses, drawing upon traditional Russian dress and even some of her designs were incorporated in an official graphic “how-to” booklet called “Art in Everyday Life” in the form of simple clothing patterns. Below are two samples:

During the 1920s and 1930s, Lamonova’s designs were successfully displayed in various exhibitions outside of Russian and at the same time she continued to design costumes for both the theater and film. Below are just a few examples of her work:

Outfit by Nadezhda Lamanova inspired by traditional costumes of northern peoples, 1923; modeled by the actress Alexandra Hohlova.

Actress Alexandra Hohlova modelling another dress design by Lamanova, 1924.

Lilichka Brik (seated) with her sister Elsa Triolet in folk-inspired dresses by Lamanova, 1925.

Lamanova fashions from the 1920s.

So, what dress is it that got us travelling down this unusual path? Here is is:

Ballgown, c. 1900, Nadezhda Lamanova; presumably in the collection of the Hermitage.

Close-up of Bodice

Close-Up of the Dress

This is a ballgown that was created in the early 1900s. Unfortunately, specific details (in English, at least) are scanty but based on the dress style, we are probably looking at sometime around 1900. While there is a tipped waist line, the bodice does not display the “pigeon breast” effect characteristic of the early 1900s. For materials, we have white satin with tulle and chiffon that has been decorated with sequins and embroidery. As with any of these dresses, the hours of hand-labor put into the embroidery and attaching the sequins is simply mind-numbing.

This ballgown is stunning and it epitomizes the luxury of the Russian Court. At the same time, know some about the designer, it’s amazing that  Nadezhda Lamanova was able to successfully reinvent herself at a time when anyone with an association to the Ancien Regime, no mater how remote, was suspect and oftentimes a one-way ticket to the firing squad. In the next installment, we will look at some more of Lamanova’s work prior to 1917. Stay tuned!

To Be Continued… 



Jacques Doucet, Part 3

In this post, we look at some more facets of Doucet. One interesting area that Doucet excelled in was designing outfits for famous actresses such as Sarah Bernhardt and Gabrielle Réjane and especially in the early 1900s. Not only did his designs enhance these actresses but it also served as a form of advertising, a practice that continues to this day. The timing could not have better with the growing trend of the lingerie dress, a fashion inspired by the earlier chemise a la reine, a style that arose in the 1780s.

Doucet Rejane 1902

Dinner Dress for Rejane, c. 1902

Doucet_Rejane 1903

Rejane, c. 1903

Below are some examples of Doucet’s day dresses:

Doucet Afternoon Dress 1900 1903_1jpg

Doucet, Afternoon Dress, c. 1900 – 1903; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.579a, b)

Doucet Afternoon Dress 1900 1903_2jpg

The above dress is made from silk chiffon that has a printed pastel-colored floral design finished with delicate ivory-colored lace trim. As a counterpoint to the ethereal effect of the silk chiffon is a bright aqua/teal-colored velvet sash that drapes down the back of the dress with matching velvet bands on each sleeve and the collar. The overall effect was one of Doucet’s signature looks and during the early 1900s, it became increasingly prominent in his day dress designs.

This dress neatly fits in with the lingerie dress trend developing in the early 1900s, a trend that took its inspiration from the late 18th Century chemise dress or chemise a la reine. Of course, the fact that Doucet was enamored of 18th Century designs no doubt influenced Doucet’s design is no surprise. At the same time, one could also argue that in Doucet’s case, his design was simply a continuation of pre-existing ideas. 🙂

In any event, Doucet’s design, and lingerie dresses in general, represents a break from earlier styles in it’s emphasis on the light and airy, in much the same way the chemise a la reine represented a break with previous styles. Below is one example of the earlier style:

Anna Maria and Thomas Jenkins, by Angelica Kauffman, 1790. National Portrait Gallery (London)

The fact that  and there is no doubt Doucet drew inspiration from the chemise a la reine (although it could also be argued that this was merely a continuation of Doucet’s pre-existing design tendencies). At the same time, however, Doucet’s design was somewhat more sophisticated in his use of colors and fabric.

Below is another example:

Doucet, Afternoon Dress, 1903; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.1153a, b)

Three-Quarter Front View

Here we see the use of a layered tomato red-colored silk chiffon ribbon trim on the bodice. The sleeves and the collar are an ivory lace trim and a silk satin sash at the waist complete the outfit. Further trim details in the same red color run in rows around the skirt. In terms of silhouette, one sees the pigeon breast characteristic of early 1900s dresses.  This dress is somewhat more restrained than the first example and its effect stems from the laying of fabrics and the use of trim.

With its characteristic pigeon breast silhouette and the use of sheer materials, lace, and ribbons, the lingerie dress served to define women’s day wear for almost a decade. In the next installment, we will continue our look at Doucet moving into the Teens.

To Be Continued…

Jacques Doucet, Part 1

jacques-doucet-dog

Jacques Doucet (1853 – 1929), portrait taken in 1926.

In this post, we’re going to take a look at another of Charles Frederick Worth’s contemporaries, Jacques Doucet. Born in 1853, Doucet was born to a prosperous family who ran a lingerie and linens business that had been established in 1817. In 1871 Doucet opened his first salon, specializing in women’s fashions. Doucet was also known as a patron of the arts and from 1880 to his death in 1929, he amassed large collections of manuscripts, furniture, paintings and various objects d’art. The 18th Century was especially one of his favorite periods and it influenced many of his designs.

Here is one of his earlier designs:

1984.337ab_F (1)

Jacques Doucet, Day Dress, c. 1880; Metropolitan Museum of Art (1984.337a, b)

1984.337ab_B

Rear View

1984.337ab_TQL

Rear three-quarter profile.

1984.337ab_S

Side Profile View

1984.337b_d3 1984.337b_d2

With this dress, Doucet utilizes a combination of beaded trim,  lace, and embroidered fabrics to achieve an elegant  and refined design. The embroidered design on the bodice is especially striking. Below is a close-up of the design:

1984.337b_d (1)

The relatively unadorned skirt serves as a background/counterpoint, thus allowing the bodice and sleeves to take center focus. The trim on the skirt hem is easy to overlook but it also adds a subtle touch but you really have to look at for a bit before it makes it’s impact. Finally, there are the enameled buttons which also lend another decorative touch:

Enameled buttons run down the front of the bodice.

1984.337a_label

And of course, the label.

Looking at the train, it appears that there was a minimal bustle which was characteristic of dresses from the early 1880s. However, the train appears to almost untidy and somewhat clumsy, detracting from the overall effect of the dress. It is hard to say if the way the dress is displayed above was worn in the same manner but I would suspect not. It would appear that the dress was not properly bustled when it was set up on display but this is only our opinion.

Doucet was known for the use of various transparent materials and extensive beadwork and jeweling. Below are some examples:

001

Doucet, Evening Dress, c. 1898 – 1900; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.2533a, b)

Bodice

Close-up of the bead and trim work.

According to the Met Website, the dress had become fragile (which explains why it’s not mounted on a mannequin). The decoration on the outside appears to be a combination of jewels, metallic bead work, gold lamé and fabric set on a base netting of sorts (it’s hard to tell from just the photo alone).

Below is another example of Doucet’s work in gold lamé:

Jacques Doucet, Ball Gown, c. 1898 – 1902; Metropolitan Museum of Art (2009.300.3274a, b)

Rear View

Side Profile

Black and white three-quarters view.

Three-Quarter View

65.184.64a-b view2

The ball gown is constructed from a gold lamé and trimmed in gold appliques on the skirt and bodice. The bodice combines gold lamé, appliques, and netting. The full impact of the gold lamé is not fully evident until one looks at the three three-quarter view pictures above. The gold lamé appears fairly lifeless but when it’s viewed as a three-dimensional garment, the dress seems to come alive; it can only be imagined how the dress would have looked when it was first worn.

Doucet’s use of metallic fabrics, embroidery, and trim were inspired by 18th Century design elements to create rich textures that were delicate and overwhelming at the same time. In short, it was luxury taken to its ultimate limit.

In our next installment, we’ll take a further look at Doucet so stay tuned! 🙂

To Be Continued…

The Latest From the Atelier…

Getting ready to pattern this little lady, taking notes, and listening to her stories. What is sweet about her is that she breaks the “no colored lace” rule. The blue lace on the front (not the net) is constructed from blue thread, not over dyed… She’s a great combination of machine-made processes and hand construction of the early 20th century. (And she lives here!)

Bodice_Exterior

And For Some More Japonisme…

In a previous post, we discussed the rise of Japonisme in the West during the late 19th Century and especially in France and Great Britain. The opening of Japan to the West excited people’s curiosity and this was especially true of artists such as Monet, Tissot, and Whistler. Japonisme’s influence was also reflected in theater; Puccini’s Madame Butterfly (1904) and Gilbert and Sullivan’s The Mikado (1885) are probably the most well-known of this genre.

The_Mikado_Three_Little_Maids

One of the most basic cultural imports was the kimono and it was readily adapted for use, at least in a theatrical or “dress  up” context:

2e556a03b8b9d894cd434ed88d285ab2

Viennese actress, c. 1907.

1f6827e785d6a9aeacabbed8279ba25b

It’s not clear just what exactly the context of the above picture is but it appears that it was some sort of amateur theatrical production. Japanese themes were also a “go-to” for ideas for wear at fancy dress balls:

fancydress7

“Springtime in Japan” from What to Wear to Fancy Dress Balls by Ardern Holt, 1896.

Naturally Japonisme found its way into fashion and as mentioned on my prior post, it was reflected in use of traditional Japanese fabrics and especially kimono fabric. Below is on example from 1896 that reflects Jean-Philippe Worth’s interpretation of Japanese style elements:

tumblr_n04uapSv3z1ri2ddio5_1280

Afternoon Dress, Worth, 1896; Museum of the City of New York (49.125.1A-B)

tumblr_n04uapSv3z1ri2ddio4_1280

Rear View

This dress was worn by Mrs. Henry A. Tailer, at the marriage of her daughter, January 16, 1896. The skirt and bodice are made from a lavender silk brocade with a decorative pattern depicting a stylized “kousa” or Japanese flowering dogwood. The bodice had the appearance of a jacket and it is boned and fitted with curved tails on the rear. A faux shirtwaist is built into the bodice, forming a vestee. The skirt is flat in front and flows to the rear with a minimal bustle that is reminiscent of the later 1880s style. The most striking feature is the blending of the design motif across the seams and this is especially evident on the rear of the bodice. The design is also enhanced by the curves of the skirt and it displays the design to its fullest.

tumblr_n04uapSv3z1ri2ddio3_1280

Close-Up of the back of the bodice and skirt.

tumblr_n04uapSv3z1ri2ddio2_500

Side Profile

tumblr_n04uapSv3z1ri2ddio1_1280

Close-Up of the decorative design and the seaming on the back of the bodice.

Worth commissioned his silk fabrics from various silk weavers located in Lyon and the above silk is no exception. The decorative motif of the above silk fabric  depicts a stylized “kousa” or Japanese flowering dogwood which is distinguished by its petal-like pointed bracts, and bamboo canes.

However, as we move into the 20th Century, designers were not content to simply incorporate Japanese style elements into Western designs but rather, they adapted Japanese clothing designs themselves, mainly with the kimono. Below is one example of this from Callot Soers:

tumblr_mq1vdftrsa1ri2ddio1_1280

Evening Dress, Callot Soeurs, 1908; Kyoto Costume Institute

The above evening dress from Callot Soeurs has been adapted from a basic kimono style and it incorporates both Japanese and Chinese decorative elements (Chinoiserie was also big at this time).

Bellow is another example, this time from Paul Poiret, 1913:

Poiret 1913

Poiret, Evening Dress, 1913; Museum at the Fashion Institute of Technology (P81.8.1)

Poiret 1913_2

Detail of beading.

The above evening dress incorporates both Japanese and Middle Eastern style elements in that it starts with his signature lampshade tunic with a kimono-like top combined with harem pants.  This outfit has been called the “Sorbet Gown” on account of its lampshade tunic decorated with pearl embroidery in sherbet colors of pistachio, pink, and mauve.

The kimono style was especially reflected with evening coats or mantles. Here is one that was made by Worth in 1909:

tumblr_mpbwvfLn9W1ri2ddio1_500

Evening Mantle, Jean-Philippe Worth, 1909; Victoria and Albert Museum (T.207-1970)

tumblr_mpbwvfLn9W1ri2ddio2_400

Rear View

tumblr_mpbwvfLn9W1ri2ddio3_500

Rear Close-Up

tumblr_mpbwvfLn9W1ri2ddio4_500

Front Close-Up

This evening mantle is made of purple silk and is embroidered with flowers in shades of pink, blue, white and green. It has a dark blue velvet band on the front and at both wrists. The mantle is gathered at the front and at the back where a flower made of purple silk is applied.

By the end of the Teens, we can see Japonisme, along with other Oriental style elements such as Chinoiserie becoming taken up and became more completely integrated into Western fashion as a whole, a process that perhaps took some 50 or 60 years to achieve. In looking at the broad scope of fashion history, cross-cultural influences in fashion are an age-old concept. However, where it might have taken decades for a style to become integrated with the host culture’s fashions, the process was happening at an increasingly faster rate.

Compared to previous centuries, the process of cultural fusion rapidly accelerated during the 20th Century to the point where change is measured in days and weeks rather than months and years as had been the case earlier. Japonisme provides an interesting case study of this process of cultural fusion between East and West and it is a process that has yet to completely play out.