John Redfern/Redfern & Sons, Part 1

f22d6bae85b622352876d7a09c9ad9f4

John Redfern (1820 – 1895)

One of the lesser-known designers of the late 19th and early 20th Centuries was John Redfern (1820 – 1895). Not a lot of information is out there but here’s what I managed to find out. Redfern was originally trained as a tailor and in 1850 opened a draper’s establishment in Cowes on the Isle of Wight. In 1871, he expanded his business to sell silk and mourning garments. Later, Redfern expanded in offering yachting outfits and other clothing for women, capitalizing on the Isle of Wight being a center for yachting activity. Redfern is credited for being one of the first designers to make tailored clothing respectable for women.

In contrast to Worth who insisted on having his clients travel to him, Redfern established a number of locations close to his wealthy clientele. With the aid of his son Ernest Redfern and an employee Charles Poynter (who later added the surname Redfern to his name), Redfern opened tailoring houses in London and Paris in 1881, followed by two shops in New York in 1884-85, one for tailoring, the other for furs. By 1882 Redfern was successful in becoming Tailors by Appointment for the Princess of Wales and by 1885 had become Tailors by Appointment for Queen Victoria and Queen Emma of the Netherlands, among others. The advertisements below attest to this and in others, Redfern was marketing his firm as being a “Ladies Tailor”.

books

Advertisement from Vol. V, No. 105 (January 1, 1885) issue of Life.

Redfern_1885_Ad-B

1885 Advertisement

Redfern Ad_1887

Advertisement from Harper’s Bazar, November 26, 1887.

Redfern’s forte was tailored garments as can be seen from the September 17, 1887 issue of Harper’s Bazar:

Harpers Bazzar_Redfern Sept 17 1887

Harper’s Bazar, September 17, 1887.

The three figures in the middle are dressed in the tailored suit style for women that often involved waistcoats, faux and functioning. Redfern helped to popularize this look along with the later “tailormade” style that was to develop in the 1890s. of which the following is just one example:

6f0ce57aebc8bd1546068cfd2cda812e

Bodice Jacket, Redfern, 1892; National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne (D187.a-c-1974)

The theme of the tailored women’s suit is taken further with this ensemble that Redfern made circa 1887 – 1889. It features two different bodices and an additional front skirt panel. The heavy use of looping braid and buttons takes on a military look, making for a structured look.

b2d40c09f3158dba1debdd6216d440fd

Day Dress Ensemble, Redfern, c. 1887 – 1889; Metropolitan Museum of Art ( 49.3.32a–e).

49.3.32c_F

49.3.32abce_S (1)

49.3.32abce_B (2)

49.3.32b_F (1)

Close-Up of Skirt

And now for the second style. The above bodice could be replaced with a similar one trimmed in a long row of buttons running along each side of the opening. Inset is a one large row of looped braid running down the front.

49.3.32abe_F (1)

49.3.32a_F (1)

49.3.32abe_B (1)

49.3.32a_B (1)

The second look is interesting in that the bodice has a tail attached to it that spread out to cover the skirt as can be seen below:

49.3.32abe_TQR

The above ensemble is a good example of the tailormade look that was beginning to take hold in the late 1880s. One can see that the bustle is fairly minimal and it’s likely that there was only a bustle pad used underneath.

In the next installment, we will look at a few more examples of Redfern’s work during the late 19th Century. It is interesting that as the 1890s progressed, Redfern would begin to diversify more, creating softer designs that got away from his signature “tailormade” style.

To Be Continued….



Lily Absinthe Goes to Africa…Part 1

Out-of-Africa-Gallery-5

With the incredibly warm and humid weather we’ve experiencing lately and for a change of pace, we’re going to take a look at a different sort of film: Sidney Pollack’s Out of Africa. Released in 1986 and starring Meryl Streep, Robert Redford, and Klaus Maria Brandauer, it is based on Karen Blixen’s book of the same title about her life in Kenya from 1913 through 1931. The costumes were designed by Milena Canonero and the she won the Best Costume from the British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA).

With Kenya as the setting, it’s natural that safari-style clothes styles would be given pride of place and Canonero does not disappoint. With the exception of a few scenes, Streep is pictured wearing outfits that are all based on women’s casual styles that were extant during the late teens and 1920s modified for the tropical/near-tropical climate of East Africa. According Canonero, she tried to keep the clothes of lead characters in neutral colors- khakis, whites, and ivories; in a few scenes Streep does wear some black and navy for Streep. The brighter colors for the Africans.

Below are some of the various outfits:

meryl-streeps-style-out-of-africa-8-e1342969798886

Meryl Streep6

The above outfit is a direct descendant of the shirtwaist/skirt combination that was characteristic of the 1890s but now more relaxed and without the corset.

Meryl-in-Out-of-Africa-out-of-africa-3701674-550-297

The coat in this picture appears to be a little more fancy that the other ones with the collar trim and appears to have been made of linen.

8baaf5a0128e4664fb31239d9d5eb331meryl-streeps-style-out-of-africa-12-e1342970118280

The coat in the above two pictures appears to have been made of linen.

meryl-streeps-style-out-of-africa-21-e1342970720729

It’s difficult to tell what fabric this coat is made from- either linen or cotton, most likely cotton along with the matching breeches.

And of course, things would not be complete without a pith helmet. 🙂

What is especially striking from the above pictures are that the colors of her outfits harmonize with the background and she seems to almost blend in with the countryside.

Just for comparison, below are some pictures of the real Karen Blixen (Dinesen):

Karen Blixen2

Karen Blixen and her brother Thomas Dinesen, c. 1920s.

Karen Blixen and her brother Thomas Dinesen, c. 1920s.

Karen Blixen and

Karen Blixen and Denys Finch Hat­ton

As can be seen from both the movie wardrobe and original pictures, it is obvious that the style of these garments were practical and harmonized with the local environment. In many respects the styles are almost timeless and have influenced fashion to this day. In fact, around the same time that the movie was released, Banana Republic developed a line of updated “Safari Clothing” that was very popular during the mid to late 1980s.

banana2

From Banana Republic Catalog No. 22, Spring 1985.

From Banana Republic Catalog 22, Spring 1985.

brsummer85007

Banana Republic Catalog 23, Summer 1985.

From Banana Republic Catalog

From Banana Republic Catalog 21, Winter 1984.

The interaction between costume for film and fashion in general has existed since the advent of movies and the influence of Out of Africa is no exception.

In the next post, we will take a look at some more costumes from the movie that are not “safari style”. 🙂

To be continued… 

Lily Absinthe Looks At Gustave Beer

Label_Beer2

When people think of fashion, they think of France and Paris in particular. However, while Pars may have reigned as the fashion center of the Western world during the 19th and early 20th Centuries, the designers themselves were not necessarily French. Of these designers, Charles Worth is probably the most well-known of these non-French designers and his influence on fashion was undeniable.

One “foreign” designer who is not so well-known was Gustave Beer. Gustave (or Gustav, spellings vary) Beer was born in Germany about 1875 and first established himself as a designer in Vienna. Later, he relocated to Paris where he opened a fashion house in 1905. Beer’s approach tended to be conservative, emphasizing exquisite construction and fine materials over daring designs.

Below are just a few examples:

Opera Cape1

Opera Cape, c. 1895 – 1905

Day Dress c. 1904 - 1905 Gustave Beer

Day Dress, c. 1904 – 1905; Metropolitan Museum of Art (1999.135a–e)

Day Dress c. 1904 - 1905 Gustave Beer

Some more views.

Moving a bit later:

Gustave Beer Evening Dress c. 1905

Evening Dress, c. 1905

Gustave Beer Evening Dress c. 1905

And the evening gown as it was worn…

And a few detail pictures:

Gustave Beer Evening Dress c. 1905

Gustave Beer Evening Dress c. 1905

Unfortunately, the years have not been kind to this dress and there’s serious deterioration, especially in the interior:

beergownealin

Below is an ensemble c. 1905 consisting of skirt and two bodices allowing a quick change from day to evening dress:

Gustave Beer

Gustave Beer

Unfortunately, there’s not a lot out there about Beer but from what I’ve gathered, his fashion house continued until 1929 when it merged with the House of Drecoll to exist as Drecoll-Beer. Subsequently, Drecoll-Beer merged with the House of Agnes in 1931 and the Beer name was dropped.

We’ll be doing some more on Beer in the future as we unearth further information. 🙂



Fashion As A Business & Commercialization

Races at Longchamps, Manet, 1867

Races at Longchamps, Manet, 1867

In contrast to our posts of the past few days, today we go to France to take a look at Haute Couture, how it was publicized, and the start of “street style”. By no means is this an exhaustive review but merely an attempt to show some of the high points.

“Fashion” as we know it today began to take form during the late 19th Century. Essentially, fashion was something that was entering the public consciousness on a scale broader than anything ever seen before. The industrial revolution played a major role in the development of fashion in a rising standard of living combined with the development of new methods of manufacturing textile goods made clothing more affordable for more people. Along with this was the rise of the middle class who now had the money and the leisure time to be able follow fashion more closely.

Where once fashion was limited to a monarch and his court, now fashion was far more defuse. Also, just as important, fashion and clothing manufacturing were developing into larger business enterprises and business concerns often drove fashion. This is similar to what we see today but only on a more limited scale with a smaller clientele.

Along with the commercialization of fashion by Couturiers such as Charles Worth, Jacques Doucet, Paul Poiret, and a host of others, was the need to more effectively market their fashions. Where word-or-mouth was sufficient, more direct methods of getting fashion styles (i.e., product) before the public were needed and thus developed advertising, fashion journals, fashion plates, and later, fashion photography.

With the development of the fashion industry and marketing, those who followed fashion wanted to see these fashions “live”. The concept of the runway show as a public spectacle was still years off but other ways to show off the latest styles were employed.

If it's seen at Longchamps, then you're OK... :-)

If it’s seen at Longchamps, then you’re OK… As is the case today, being seen in a public place with the just the right outfit could make all the difference. 🙂

Once such method was dressing up models with the latest styles and sending them to various public social gathering such as the horse races at Longchamps and in particular, the Grand Prix de Paris which was held every year in July. More than just a horse race, it was a day-long affair that provided a venue for people to see and been seen and that of course meant what they were wearing. Naturally, the press covered these events and end was result was free publicity.

Below are just a few of the examples of the styles worn at Longchamps during the period from 1900 to 1914.

Les Modes, 1904

Les Modes, July 1904

Longchamps1

Longchamps2

tumblr_njb541lW5J1rlm2lro9_500

The women in the above pictures are wearing versions of the lingerie dress and one can see the influence of the s-bend corset although the silhouette is somewhat muted by the fluffy layers of fabric on the dresses. These definitely fall in the 1900 – 1910 time frame, probably more towards 1902 – 1905.

And sometimes, fashion at Longchamps could cause a sensation…below is a picture from 1908 of three models wearing designs by Jeanne Margaine-Lacroix (known simply as Margaine-Lacroix) and dubbed by the press “Les Nouvelles Merveilleuses”:

d587987d85c3b1012273b4927790fa9e

c. 1908, “Les Nouvelles Merveilleuses” as dubbed by the press- these three models caused a furor at Longchamps when they arrived- these dresses, designed by Jeanne Margaine-Lacroix were considered scandalous at the time.

The above three dresses definitely got public attention, in part because they completely did away with the conventional corset while at the same time creating a skin-tight silhouette by utilizing stretch fabrics in the dresses themselves to create the form-fitting silhouette.  Susie Ralph, a fashion historian, described it in an introduction that opened an exhibit on Margaine-Lacroix in 2013:

In 1908 Jeanne Margaine-Lacroix sent three mannequins to the Longchamp race-course clad in her form-revealing robes-tanagréennes. These corsetless dresses caused a sensation among Paris’ fashionable crowd – a riot according to some newspaper reports. Worn without corsets and slit to the knee on one side over the most transparent of underskirts, their impact on the fashion world was instantaneous and resulted in major press coverage not only in Paris but around the world. In today’s parlance the style immediately “went viral”….It was Margaine-Lacroix’s daring vision that brought to an end the ideal of the rigidly corseted hour-glass figure, and ushered in the new, slim twentieth century silhouette.

Margaine-Lacroix is an interesting designer in her own right although she is relatively unknown today. Hopefully we’ll be writing more about her in the future. Here, is where the above picture originally was featured:

new-picture-7

Controversy is no stranger to the world of fashion then or now and the debate over what exactly is too “revealing” still rages on. Moving on, fashion photography becomes ever more pervasive during in the years from 1910 – 1914. Here are some more examples:

1912-at-the-races

1912, Watching the races standing on chairs. The lines on these two dresses reflect the moved towards a more sleek, upright silhouette. Goodbye s-bend!

1914

1914, Here is an interesting design incorporating a waistcoat and cutaway coat.

Public spaces like Longchamps provided a venue for people to see “fashion in action” and for us, it provides a fascinating archive of fashion history that helps us to see fashion that is alive. We can see just how garments were worn, how they fit, and even gain some insight into the people who wore them.


Postscript:

Originally I set out to write this blog post about the development of fashion and how it was publicized on public places. However, along the way I also discovered the Les Nouvelles Merveilleuses controversy and the work of the a relatively now forgotten designer Margaine-LaCroix. It just goes to show that you learn something new everyday! 🙂

The Titanic and the “Titanic Era” in Costume History, Part 3

Untergang der Titanic (

Untergang der Titanic (“Sinking of the Titanic”) by Willy Stöwer, 1912

And now Dear Readers, we come to our third installment of “The Titanic Era” and I want to thank you all for enduring my somewhat lengthy posts regarding the evolution of fashion from 1900 through 1912. I will admit that perhaps I restated the obvious a bit but I also believe that it never hurts to get an idea of the proverbial “big picture” and how one tragic, yet fascinating episode of history fits in.

In many ways, the sinking of the RMS Titanic was a microcosm of both the good and not-so-good elements characteristic of the era from 1900 to the outbreak of the First World War in 1914. To many, it represented beauty, decadence, and opulence perched on the brink of disaster and a preview of the social, economic, and political forces that were to be unleashed by that war, a war that ultimately saw an almost near-complete rearrangement of the political, economic, and social landscape of Europe, then the center of the Western World. So profound were the effects of the First World War, that its effects are still felt today in 2015.

Of course, much of the above observations are neither new or original on our part; commentators were saying much of the same back in the early 20th Century, some almost as soon as the first survivors were arriving in New York on board the RMS Carpathia on April 18, 1912, some three days after the disaster. However, this is still thought provoking and holds a fascination up to this day.

One of the primary manifestations of this era of opulence was in its fashions and this in turn has been a constant feature in the numerous dramatic films and documentaries that have been turned out over the years. Watching a compelling story about an historical event is fascinating in that one is viewing the past being brought back to life and costume plays a key role in this. Done correctly, it can enhance the experience immeasurably; done wrong, it can seriously compromise a production (of course, in some cases the best wardrobe/costuming in the world can’t save a production from a poor script and/or poor direction).

Now, one movie that does an excellent job of production design and wardrobe/costuming is Titanic that came out in 1997. Starring Leonard DiCaprio and Kate Winslett, this  movie works the disaster angle by way of an Romeo and Juliet type of story of mismatched lovers from two vastly different social classes. The plot itself is somewhat improbable with the characters acting more like people of the 1990s than the 1912. Also, it demonstrates an almost complete lack of understanding of social classes during the period and relies on the usual modern day stereotypes to move the story along. In the end, it borders on a schmaltzy sentimentality approaches the simply irritating. But, as with all things, you be the judge. 🙂

Poster advertising the movie

Poster advertising the movie “Titanic”, 1997.

All right, now that I’ve savaged the movie’s plot, let’s move on to one of the movie’s best aspect: the costuming. The costumes were designed by Deborah L. Scott and she won an Academy Award for Best Costume Design in 1997 for her work on Titanic.

Starting with day wear, the most notable dress is, of course, the “boarding dress” which Rose, the main female lead, wears when she boards the RMS Titanic early in the movie:

The Boarding Dress

The Boarding Dress- From a travelling exhibit of movie costumes sponsored by the Victoria & Albert Museum. This picture provides a pretty decent view of the boarding dress along with the costume sketch that it’s based on.

cb_rose3

A costume sketch of the boarding dress from the production.

From the Hollywood Costume Exhibit in Los Angeles. This is an

From the Hollywood Costume Exhibit in Los Angeles. This is an “official” picture since the viewing public was not allowed to take pictures.

Boarding Dress3

On the left, one major source of inspiration for the boarding dress side-by-side with the costume from the movie., designed by Deborah L. Scott. The original is pictured in Les Modes (Paris) for Linker & Company, 1912.

The original source, Les Modes, 1912.

The original source, Les Modes, 1912, for Linker & Company.

In comparing the original dress with the movie version, one can see that they both use the stripes on the fabric to emphasize the vertical lines of the dress. The silhouette is decidedly slender and tubular, its shape being created by the draping of the fabric itself. There is little hint of a corset or any other structural underpinnings (although there is little doubt that there was a corset present, at least on the model wearing the 1912 dress).

What is also striking is that both dresses not only utilize vertical stripes, but that they’re also integrated with horizontal stripes on the front of the jacket and each set of stripes intersects at a precise 90 degree angle. Also, to add further accent, large buttons are used. Interestingly enough, the buttons used on the movie dress are significantly smaller than those on the original. Finally, the one major difference between the two dresses is that the 1912 dress is also fur-trimmed on the cuffs and around the neck which gives the dress a more heavy look/feel- basically it’s a winter day dress. The movie version reads much lighter and as such, I think it just works better.

Both dresses are geometrical with their use of precise lines but the 1912 version works better because the lines are more wide and well defined. The lines on the movie version almost wash out, depending on the light. When I viewed this dress in person at the Hollywood Costume Exhibit, the lighting was very dark with bright spotlights illuminating the garments. Under the harsh light, the striped lines on the dress were somewhat washed out and when viewed from more than a few feet away, they disappeared. In the end, I do not believe that it affects the overall effect but it’s still interesting to note (plus it really detracted from the overall exhibition).

Here's a set of detail shots of the dress and hat.

Detail shots of the dress and hat.

Finally, it’s interesting that the designer chose to use a dark purple velvet to highlight the lapels and the collar. In the absence of the dark fur trim, some sort of dark accent is needed and highlighting the lapels and collar was a good design choice; they help to offset the thin lines in that and the eye tends to be drawn to them rather than the lines.

In terms of style, the boarding dress definitely captures the fashion trends that were going on at the time, especially in terms of the silhouette. The only quibble there might be is with the exaggerated bow on the hat but it’s not a deal-breaker by any means. Overall, it definitely captures a moment in time.

In the next installment, we’ll look at some more of the wardrobe from Titanic how it fits into fashion during the years from 1900 to 1912.