Lily Absinthe’s Spring Color Palette, 2016

As a follow-up to our previous post, we thought that we’d delve a little more into the inspiration for our chartreuse design for Spring 2016…

Karin_Spring 1880s_1


Chartreuse has been a major inspiration for us this Spring and just for fun, we thought we’d include a little more about it- you could call it our electronic mood board, if you will. This color has really struck a chord with us this year, perhaps because of Chartreuse’s association with the Aesthetic Movement which was in full bloom during the 1880s. With its focus on art for art’s sake, the Aesthetic Movement was a reaction to industrialization and the growth of commercial culture (i.e. “the marketplace”) and it sought to re-introduce elements of pre-industrial society back into society. Originally focused in Great Britain, the movement gained adherents both in the United States and Western Europe. On a more basic level, adherents of the Aesthetic Movement believed that art should be only governed by aesthetics rather than practical or moral considerations- it was to only exist for itself, not to serve a greater social need. Although starting with painting, the Aesthetic Movement also encompassed all the arts and ultimately found its way into fashion, primarily through color and textiles in the form of design motifs. Finally, the Aesthetic Movement also drew inspiration from the Middle and Far East and especially with Japonisme.

William Morris Forest Tapestry

Detail of Forest Tapestry by William Morris

Color was especially influenced by the Aesthetic Movement in that the emphasis was placed on colors that closely matched those found in the natural world and various shades of green were an integral part of this. For us, chartreuse was a natural choice and it reflected in the various trims that we are incorporating in one of our spring designs:

wp-1459746197901.jpg

Trim for a new dress under construction.

Based on the above picture, we were able to generate a rough color palette:

Spring Colors2

Now, we grant that color interpretation, especially with computers, can be a somewhat subjective thing so we’ve supplemented it with a more traditional color palette for chartreuse and related color shades:

Spring Colors8

A computer-generated color palette is one thing, nature is another. Let’s take a look at some natural inspiration:

Spring Colors3

chartreuse-monastery

Spring Colors4

MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

And now for a little more inspiration other sources, starting with the House of Worth:

Worth

Evening Dress, House of Worth, c. 1899; Metropolitan Museum of Art (35.134.16a, b)

306974d11163f2ed43bf479c88ded9e2

Wedding Dress, 1874; Chicago History Museum (1946.31a-d). Worn by Harriet Newell Dewey when she married Robert S. Elder.

And a few paintings…

Rossetti1

“Veronica Veronese” (1872) by Dante Rossetti (1828 – 1882)

Chartreuse1

“The Mirror” (1889) by Gunnar Berndtson (1854- 1895).

Chartreuse2

“Dawn” (1907) by Edmund Hodgson Smart (1873 – 1942)

And finally, just for fun since the color also plays off of Lily Absinthe’s signature color… 🙂

Chartreuse-Tarragona-1951

Spring Colors5

This is just one of several designs were developing and we’ll have more to show in later posts. We hope you have enjoyed this little journey though the process of inspiration. 🙂

 

Lily Absinthe At The FIDM Museum

As part of the A Graceful Gift: Fans from the Mona Lee Nesseth Collection Exhibit that we viewed at the FIDM Museum last week, we were struck by some of the dresses that were used to accompany the exhibition. Of course, while the fans are works of beauty in their own right, it was the dresses that really stole the show (sorry 🙂 )

First, we start with a design from 1903 by Jeanne Paquin:

Paquin Bacchante Gown 1903

Afternoon Dress, Jeanne Paquin, 1903; FIDM Museum (2012.5.12AB)(Photo: Alex Berliner)

Paquin_1903_2

Close-up view of the bodice (Photo: Alex Berliner)

In terms of style, this dress is very typical of the early 1900s with its s-bend/pigeon breast silhouette. The bodice and skirt are an ivory/cream silk satin overlaid with ivory/cream lave on the skirt and black chiffon on the bodice and sleeves. The bodice is further trimmed along the neckline with a double row of ivory/cream satin to include a line of flowers. The skirt is also trimmed in rows of ivory/cream satin ribbons and flowers over layers of black chiffon. Finally, at the waist is a wide belt of black satin ribbon. What is especially remarkable about this dress is the deft use of black- and this was NOT a mourning dress. During the 1890s and on into the 20th Century, there had been a trend taking black away from its traditional association with mourning and Paquin was one of those instrumental in this movement.

Below are some views that I was able to get. Unfortunately, because the dress was set far back from the railing, it was difficult to get good pictures so we had to rely on some from the FIDM Museum above in order to present a clear overview.

20160325_111108.jpg

20160325_111128.jpg

20160325_111102.jpg

20160325_111119.jpg

Close-up of skirt trim.

The fan was also a nice addition but unfortunately it was impossible to get a good picture, especially since the right was reflecting off it it, making the image blurry. Also, at the same time, the fan was a bit of a hinderance in that it was so large that it tended to screen the dress, making it difficult to get good pictures. In terms of overall aesthetics, it’s our opinion that the fan is simply detracts detracts from the dress.

Finally, as an interesting follow-up, here is what is believed to be the original design sketch for this dress:

2013GT8557_jpg_l

Fashion Design Sketch Entitled “Bricette” For Paquin, c. 1903; V&A Museum (E.764-1967)

The relationship between the design sketch and the actual dress is discussed in the FIDM Museum blog and it’s an interesting account.

The next dress of interest was this circa 1904 design from the House of Pingat-Wallès (in 1896, Emile Pingat sold his fashion house to another house, A. Wallès who merged his name with Pingat’s and conducted business under that name). Here is the dress itself:

Pingat 1906

Day Dress, House of Pingat-Wallès, c. 1904; FIDM Museum

As with the Paquin design, style-wise this dress also reflects the s-bend/pigeon breast silhouette characteristic of the early 1900s (although it must be noted that the silhouette is nowhere as extreme as some others of the period that we have seen). Instead of chiffon and lace, Pingat-Wallès utilizes a black and white floral ivory silk satin skirt covered in larger black floral appliques. The bodice utilizes the same floral silk satin styled with wide lapels/revers with the same black floral appliques as the skirt. The upper bodice front is also trimmed with velvet lattice-work framing a sheer waist.

We had a chance to observe this dress up close and we noted the quality of the workmanship. For example, the spaces in the velvet lattice-work are cut out towards where they meet the waist- this sort of operation is very labor-intensive. Also, the floral appliques are neatly stitched to the skirt and bodice with dozens of tiny stitches. We shudder to think of the time that this must have taken but such is the nature of haute couture. 🙂

Below are some more views:

20160325_111157.jpg

20160325_111335.jpg

And finally, here are some more detail views:

The next dress is by a lesser-known couturier by the name of Christoph von Drecoll who originally got his start in Vienna in 1896 and later opened a branch in Paris in 1902:

Drecoll 1

Afternoon Dress, Drecoll, c. 1898; FIDM Museum

Drecoll 1b

Drecoll 1a

The circa 1898 date on the this dress places it a bit earlier than the previous two but its silhouette is similar (we would venture to guess that the date given by the museum might be a bit too early). The skirt and bodice are a matching ivory/cream silk satin with floral appliques. Although it’s hard to make out from the angle of the pictures and the the black ribbon covering the bodice front, the bodice is of a cutaway design that tapers back to reveal a pleated faux-waist, also in ivory/cream silk satin. The skirt hem consists of a row of contrasting dull and shiny silk strips that harmonizes with the floral designs on the skirt. At the waist is a wide black silk ribbon belt separating the skirt from the bodice and a silk chiffon ribbon tie in front.

We have purposely omitted any discussion of the collar/neck treatment until now…in a word, it’s dreadful. The collar is completely incongruous with the rest of the neck and strikes a discordant note in what would otherwise be a smart, elegant design. The collar is thick and reads like a cervical collar and tends to draw the eye away from the rest of the dress. In some respects it reminds us of the collar/ruff on the Lucy wedding dress in Dracula. Hideous, to be sure.

Just to be fair, here are some more views of the dress:

Three different dresses from three different couturiers, all in similar ivory/cream and black and all representing three different approaches to style in the early 1900s (if we ignore the date on the Drecoll dress). Although these dresses were intended as a backdrop for the fan exhibition, we would argue that it’s really the reverse: the fans were simply an accessory to the dresses. 🙂 To be honest, if the goal was to display fans, there should have been a greater focus on that elements, perhaps sans dresses. But that’s just our opinion and in any event, it was all a work of art and sheer beauty and to be able to see these dresses “in the flesh” was a treat. 🙂

A Brief Look At Fans…

During the late 19th Century and early 20th Centuries, fans were considered an essential fashion accessory and especially for any woman who wanted to present herself in the best possible light. Recently, we had an opportunity to take a look at some as part of the A Graceful Gift: Fans from the Mona Lee Nesseth Collection Exhibition at the FIDM Museum in Downtown Los Angeles. Introduced into Europe during the 17th Century from the Far East, the folding fan evolved from a functional item designed to keep the user cool to something that was more decorative than practical.

Folding fans came in a variety of materials ranging from the very simple and utilitarian to the ornate and materials ranged from wood to brass and ivory. The fan itself was usually made from a treated parchment (although other materials such as silk were used) which often featured painted or printed scenes. Below are two fans from 18th Century France and the variation in style is readily apparent, from the practical…

To the ornate…

Now, from the FIDM Museum exhibit:

20160325_110757.jpg

Fan, Spanish, c. 1850 – 1865

20160325_110802.jpg

Close-Up Of Fan.

The frame appears to be made of mother of pearl. All manner of scenes were painted on the fan leaves, many focusing on Oriental themes, a reflection of the then-current fascination for Chinoiserie. Painting scenes on the fan leaves were also popular as an at-home pastime and blank leaves were readily available.

Below is another example:

20160325_110825.jpg

Fan, French

20160325_110821.jpg

Close-Up Detail

Finally, here is a fan that is attributed to having once belonged to Phoebe Apperson Hearst:

FAN_FIDM Museum1

Fan, Félix Alexandre, artist Dumoret, jeweler France, c. 1875–85; Constructed of Mother-of-pearl, point de gaze lace, gilded silver & diamonds; FIDM Museum (2013.975.2AB)

Overall, it was a small but interesting exhibit. Fans are an easily overlooked fashion accessory but were considered an essential element in any respectable woman’s wardrobe. As applied to recreating period fashions today, vintage fans are readily available at a variety of price points but it must be noted that many of these are fragile with age and are not able to withstand any sort of prolonged use. There are also reproductions and restored originals but it’s been our experience that the reproductions are for the most part, substandard and a faint echo of the originals.

We hope you all have enjoyed this brief overview of fans and in the future we’ll be posting more in regard fashion accessories. 🙂

Lily Absinthe & Movie Costumes, Part I

Today we decided to take some time off and visit the 24th Annual Art of Motion Picture Costume Design at the Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising Museum in Downtown Los Angeles. This is an annual event that features costumes from some of the top films of 2015 on display where you can see them up close and personal (and the best part is that it’s free). There were costumes from a number of films but the ones that caught our attention were from Crimson Peak, Cinderella, The Hateful Eight, and The Revenant.

20160325_115044.jpg

A sampling of the posters from the movies whose costumes were on display.

20160325_115004.jpg

The best part was that there were not a lot of people, the benefit of viewing the exhibition on a weekday.

One pleasant about the exhibit was that most of the costumes were easily viewed and only a few were set so far back that you couldn’t make out the details. Also, in many cases it was possible to view the costumes from various angles so you could see the sides and rear. Finally, we always recommend going to these sorts of exhibits on a weekday: that way you avoid the crowds and people aren’t getting in the way as you’re trying to get pictures or otherwise view the costumes.

Where to start? Well, in contrast to our usual focus, we’ll start by looking at the costumes from The Hateful Eight. While we are not hardcore fans of Quentin Tarantino, we did find the costuming to be imaginative and the costumes definitely set the characters apart. Also very noteworthy was the use of distressing to age the costumes- distressing is a real art form and it takes a lot of thought to get this right (otherwise it simply looks like someone ran over the costume with a car a few times).

Here we see a basic frock coat that’s definitely had some mileage put on it:

20160325_104729.jpg

Full Image

20160325_104735.jpg

Close-Up. Note the mending on the right sleeve.

What is notable about this coat is the variety of wear and tear that it displays. There’s lending on the right sleeve, the area around one of the button holes has been reinforced, the collar has been modified by the addition of fur trim, and the extra wear around the shoulders. Another detail are the Revolutionary War Era Continental Army buttons- whether this was a deliberate choice by the costume designer or simply because it looked “old” is hard to tell but it’s definitely archaic for a movie set in the early 1870s.

Here are a few more images:

The next set of costumes that caught our attention were those from the movie Cinderella. Here the emphais is definitely on the fantastical with a mash-up of styles. Starting with the heroine Cinderella, the gown from the climactic ball scene is featured:

20160325_103537.jpg

20160325_103627.jpg

Close-Up of the bodice.

The lines of the ball gown are relatively simple and style-wise, the silhouette is definitely rooted in the 1860s although the dress is fluid and free-flowing without the rigid crinoline. While it the dress apppears to be a pale blue from a distance, the skirt is actually a combination of lavender, blue, and sheer iredescent white while the bodice is of a matching shade of blue to the skirt. Below is a better picture of the skirt treatment:

20160325_103642.jpg

Overall, it simple yet delivers a fantasitical fairy tale effect without looking contrived or being over-the-top. In many respects, this would actually serve as a good basis for a wedding gown. 🙂

Still from the movie.

It could be argued that it’s often easier to design a costume for the hero than it is for the villain but the costume designer handled it well. It would be easy to simply design a garment that simply emphasized the villain’s negative qualities but here the designer took a more subtle approach:

20160325_103810.jpg

Here we can a definite 1940s influence and especially in the silhouette. The skirt employs several layers of green ranging from an absinthe-like color to dark green and black in the background. The bodice is jeweled with sequins and uses a brigher shade of abinthe green. Now, while the effect is one of sheer 1940s-esque elegance, one cannot help but be reminded of the bright green “arsenic” dresses of the mid-19th Century- beautiful to look at but extremely toxic to the wearer and anyone who came in contact with them. It says the same about the character: beautiful but deadly not only to others but even to herself and who ultimately reveals her ugliness as a person.

On a ligher note are the dresses for the two daughters, each one a mirror image of the other in pink/salmon and yellow:

20160325_103802.jpg

20160325_103815.jpg
In contrast to the stepmother’s sophisticated dress, the two daughters’ dresses are completely childish, reflecting their empty nature. It creates a contrast between the calculating stemmother and the two empty-headed daughters. Finally, here’s a group shot of all three:

In out next installment, we’ll continue our visit to include costumes from Crimson Peak. Stay tuned!

(To be continued…)

 

The Philosophy Of Paul Poiret – Principles Of Correct Dress

Poiret_Studio

Paul Poiret was one of the most influential designers during the early 20th Century and he played a major role in shaping haute couture and the fashion industry as we know it today. Most notably, Poiret helped ensure the demise of the corset, and especially it’s most recent incarnation in the form of the s-bend corset, and introduced new designs that moved fashion away from highly structured silhouettes to more loose ones based on draping rather than tailoring. Also, Poiret was noted for the development of the hobble skirt and the “lampshade dress” as well as incorporating oriental elements in his designs.

Here we see just one example of the “lampshade” dress style from 1912:

However, lost in all of Poiret’s achievements is consideration of his ideas, or “philosophy” were about dress itself. One charge that is often laid on haute couture and their designers is that wealth automatically equates to good or “correct” dress. To Poiret:

This art has little in common with money. The woman whose resources are limited has no more cause for being dowdily dressed than the woman who is rich has reason to believe that she is beautifully gowned. Except in so far as money can procure the services of a good dressmaker, of an artist who can judge his customer’s style and garb her accordingly, the wealthy woman stands no better chance of being correctly dressed than the woman who must turn every penny before spending it. [1]

While the above is almost a truism when it comes to fashion, at least today, it’s still revealing coming from the man who had crowned himself the “King of Fashion.” Poiret further expands on this theme, stating that dressing is:

…not an easy art to acquire. It demands a certain amount of intelligence, certain gifts, some of them among the rarest, perhaps—it requires a real appreciation of harmony, of colors, ingenious ideas, absolute tact, and, above all, a love of the beautiful and clear perception of values. It may be resumed in two words, good taste. [2]

So, what is “good taste” to Poiret?

Taste is by no means developed by riches; on the contrary, the increasing demands of luxury are killing the art of dressing. Luxury and good taste are in inverse proportion to each other. The one will kill the other as machinery is crowding out handwork. In fact, it has come so far that many persons confuse the two terms. Because a material is expensive they find it beautiful; because it is cheap they think it must be ugly. [3]

The above is as true today as it was back then and we see it in the fashion nearly every day. Naturally, “good taste” can be somewhat subjective, depending on time and place but it still gets to the idea that one cannot simply buy their way into good taste, or by extension, good fashion.

Here we see a sample of the fashion illustrations that Poiret commissioned by various avant garde artists such as Paul Iribe. Here we see a definite revival of the simple vertical lines of the empire dress style:

Poiret also notes that:

In order not to appear entirely at odds with her surroundings and the place where she lives, a woman is obliged to follow fashions to a certain extent. But let that be within certain bounds. What does it matter if tight skirts be the fashion if your figure demands a wide one? Is it not important to dress so as to bring out your good points rather than to reveal the bad? Can any idea of being fashionable make up for the fact of being ridiculous? [4]

And there it it- Poiret gets to the heart of the matter by pointing out that fashion is about emphasizing one’s good points rather than the bad, something that holds true today as it did then. The above has been only a small sample of the depth of Poiret’s fashion “philosophy” but it’s interesting to see that his ideas still hold true today in many ways and as such, they represent a distinct break with the 19th Century.

1. Principles of Correct Dress, Florence Hull Winterburn, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1914, p. 237.
2. Ibid., pp. 237-238
3. Ibid., p. 239
4. Ibid., pp. 240-241